Interest in Genetic Testing for Modest Changes in Breast Cancer Risk: Implications for SNP Testing

被引:45
作者
Graves, K. D. [1 ,2 ]
Peshkin, B. N. [2 ]
Luta, G. [3 ]
Tuong, W. [2 ]
Schwartz, M. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Canc Control Program, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Jess & Mildred Fisher Ctr Familial Canc Res, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Dept Biostat Bioinformat & Biomath, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
Breast cancer risk; Genetic testing; Interest; Modest risk changes; Public health genomics; Scenario-based research; SNP testing; BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSE; GENOMIC MEDICINE; DISEASE; INFORMATION; HEALTH; ASSOCIATION; DECISIONS; CONTINUUM; PROFILES; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1159/000324703
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: Advances in genomics may eventually lead to 'personalized genetic medicine,' yet the clinical utility of predictive testing for modest changes in risk is unclear. We explored interest in genetic testing for genes related to modest changes in breast cancer risk in women at moderate to high risk for breast cancer. Methods: Women (n = 105) with a negative breast biopsy and 6 1 relative with breast or ovarian cancer completed telephone surveys. We measured demographic and psychosocial variables and, following presentation of hypothetical scenarios of genetic tests for lower-penetrance breast cancer gene mutations, assessed interest in willingness to pay for and comprehension of test results. We used logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to evaluate combinations of risk level, cost and behavioral modifiers. Results: Many women (77%) reported 'definite' interest in genetic testing, with greater interest in tests that conveyed more risk and cost less. Behavioral modifiers of risk (taking a vitamin; diet/exercise), having a regular physician, greater perceived benefits of genetic testing, and greater cancer worry also influenced interest. Most participants (63%) did not understand relative vs. absolute risk. Women with less understanding reported more cancer worry and greater willingness to pay for testing. Conclusion: Interest in genetic testing for mutations related to modest changes in risk was high, modified by both test and psychosocial factors. Findings highlight the need for education about benefits and risks of testing for mutations that convey modest changes in risk, particularly given the current lack of clinical validity/utility and availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 189
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
*23ANDME, 2010, CHOOS DNA TEST RIGHT
[2]   Interest in learning of personal genetic risk for cancer: A general population survey [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Munn, RK ;
Studts, JL .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1996, 25 (05) :527-536
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DIR TO CONS GEN TEST
[4]  
[Anonymous], IMPL GEN PUBL HLTH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Applied Longitudinal Analysis
[6]   Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing:: Who and why [J].
Armstrong, K ;
Weiner, J ;
Weber, B ;
Asch, DA .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 5 (02) :92-98
[7]   Stress and genetic testing for disease risk [J].
Baum, A ;
Friedman, AL ;
Zakowski, SG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 16 (01) :8-19
[8]   BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes [J].
Berry, DA ;
Iversen, ES ;
Gudbjartsson, DF ;
Hiller, EH ;
Garber, JE ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Lerman, C ;
Watson, P ;
Lynch, HT ;
Hilsenbeck, SG ;
Rubinstein, WS ;
Hughes, KS ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (11) :2701-2712
[9]   Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? [J].
Brain, K ;
Gray, J ;
Norman, P ;
Parsons, E ;
Clarke, A ;
Rogers, C ;
Mansel, R ;
Harper, P .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2000, 37 (03) :197-202
[10]   The path from genome-based research to population health: Development of an international public health genomics network [J].
Burke, Wylie ;
Khoury, Muin J. ;
Stewart, Alison ;
Zimmern, Ronald L. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 8 (07) :451-458