A comparative study of cancer proteins in the human protein-protein interaction network

被引:65
作者
Sun, Jingchun [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Zhongming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Sch Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Bioinformat Resource Ctr, Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Canc Biol, Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
BMC GENOMICS | 2010年 / 11卷
关键词
MOLECULAR INTERACTION DATABASE; DISEASE; GENES; FEATURES; BIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-11-S3-S5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Cancer is a complex disease. So far, many genes have been reported to involve in the development of cancer. Rather than the traditional approach to studying individual genes or loci, a systematic investigation of cancer proteins in the human protein-protein interaction network may provide important biological information for uncovering the molecular mechanisms of cancer and, potentially, other complex diseases. Results: We explored global and local network characteristics of the proteins encoded by cancer genes (cancer proteins) in the human interactome. We found that the network topology of the cancer proteins was much different from that of the proteins encoded by essential genes (essential proteins) or control genes (control proteins). Relative to the essential proteins or control proteins, cancer proteins tended to have higher degree, higher betweenness, shorter shortest-path distance, and weaker clustering coefficient in the human interactome. We further separated the cancer proteins into two groups (recessive and dominant cancer proteins) and compared their topological features. Recessive cancer proteins had higher betweenness than dominant cancer proteins, while their degree distribution and characteristic shortest path distance were also significantly different. Finally, we found that cancer proteins were not randomly distributed in the human interactome and they connected strongly with each other. Conclusion: Our study revealed much stronger protein-protein interaction characteristics of cancer proteins relative to the essential proteins or control proteins in the whole human interactome. We also found stronger network characteristics of recessive than dominant cancer proteins. The results are helpful for cancer candidate gene prioritization and verification, biomarker discovery, and, ultimately, understanding the etiology of cancer at the systems biological level.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Jeong, H ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) :378-382
[2]  
[Anonymous], KEGG PATHWAY
[3]  
[Anonymous], MOUSE GENOME INFORM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1960, PUBLICATION MATH I H
[5]   Predicting cancer involvement of genes from heterogeneous data [J].
Aragues, Ramon ;
Sander, Chris ;
Oliva, Baldo .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 9 (1)
[6]   BIND - The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database [J].
Bader, GD ;
Donaldson, I ;
Wolting, C ;
Ouellette, BFF ;
Pawson, T ;
Hogue, CWV .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (01) :242-245
[7]   Network biology:: Understanding the cell's functional organization [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Oltvai, ZN .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (02) :101-U15
[8]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[9]   The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): updates and enhancements [J].
Blake, Judith A. ;
Eppig, Janan T. ;
Bult, Carol J. ;
Kadin, James A. ;
Richardson, Joel E. .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2006, 34 :D562-D567
[10]  
Bunz F., 2008, PRINCIPLES CANC GENE