Vector control methods for induction machines: An overview

被引：50

作者：

Santisteban, JA ^{[1
]}

Stephan, RM

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, UFF, TEE, PGMEC, BR-24210240 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, COPPE, DEE, BR-21945970 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

来源：

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION | 2001年 / 44卷 / 02期

关键词：

control of electric drives; induction machines; vector control;

D O I：

10.1109/13.925828

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

In the last three decades, different vector control methods [field-oriented control (FOC), field acceleration method (FAM), universal field orientation (UFO), direct self control (DSC) and Takahashi method among others) have been proposed. It is difficult for students and nonspecialists to understand the drawbacks and advantages of each one. With this in mind, the objective. of this paper is to propose a clear classification and comparison of them.

引用

页码：170 / 175

页数：6

共 19 条

[1]

Blaschke F., 1972, SIEMENS REV, P217

[2]

Bose B. K., 2000, EPE Journal, V9, P57

[3]

de Doncker R. W., 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.88CH2565-0), P450, DOI 10.1109/IAS.1988.25099

[4]

Depenbrock M., 1988, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, V3, P420, DOI 10.1109/63.17963

[5] COMPARING THE INDIRECT FIELD-ORIENTED CONTROL WITH A SCALAR METHOD [J].

GARCIA, GO ;

STEPHAN, RM ;

WATANABE, EH .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 1994, 41 (02) :201-207

[6]

HEINEMANN G, 1989, P EUR POW EL C EPE 8, P843

[7]

Kasmierkowski M., 1994, AUTOMATIC CONTROL CO, V46

[8]

KOVACS KP, 1984, TRANSIENT PENOMENA E

[9]

KOVACS KP, 1959, TRANSIENTE VORGANGE

[10]

Leonhard W., 1996, CONTROL ELECT DRIVES, V2nd

← 1 2 →