Spatial variability of mercury emissions from soils in a southeastern US urban environment

被引:21
作者
Gabriel, MC
Williamson, DG
Brooks, S
Zhang, H
Lindberg, S
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] NOAA, ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[3] Tennessee Technol Univ, Dept Chem, Cookeville, TN 38505 USA
[4] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY | 2005年 / 48卷 / 07期
关键词
mercury flux; spatial variability; urban area; soil type; Alabama;
D O I
10.1007/s00254-005-0043-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We quantified gaseous mercury (Hg-0) fluxes over soil surfaces in an urban setting during the winters of 2003 and 2004 across the metropolitan area of Tuscaloosa, AL. The objective was to provide a first inspection of the local spatial variability of mercury flux in an urban area. Flux sampling took place on bare, undisturbed, soil surfaces within four evenly spaced landuse areas of Tuscaloosa: industrial, commercial, residential, and mixed landuse. Median total gaseous mercury fluxes (ng/m(2) h) from each site were as follows: 4.45 (residential site), 1.40 (industrial site), 2.14 (commercial site), and 0.87 (mixed landuse site). Using non-parametric statistical analyses., the residential and mixed landuse sites were found to be statistically different from the overall median flux. Landuse and soil type are the suspected factors primarily controlling the observed spatially variable fluxes. The presence of statistically different fluxes over soil surfaces on a local scale in this preliminary study warrants additional investigation, particularly during the spring and summer seasons when terrestrial mercury emission is the highest. Providing such information will help develop better estimates of mercury emission from urban areas and, ultimately, lead to more accurate and useful spatially relevant inventories.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 964
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Northeast United States and Southeast Canada natural mercury emissions estimated with a surface emission model [J].
Bash, JO ;
Miller, DR ;
Meyer, TH ;
Bresnahan, PA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (33) :5683-5692
[2]  
Burton G. A., 2002, STORMWATER EFFECTS H
[3]   Sunlight-mediated emission of elemental mercury from soil amended with municipal sewage sludge [J].
Carpi, A ;
Lindberg, SE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (07) :2085-2091
[4]   Application of a Teflon™ dynamic flux chamber for quantifying soil mercury flux:: Tests and results over background soil [J].
Carpi, A ;
Lindberg, SE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (05) :873-882
[5]   Global circulation of atmospheric mercury: a modelling study [J].
Dastoor, AP ;
Larocque, Y .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (01) :147-161
[6]   Evidence for organic film on an impervious urban surface: Characterization and potential teratogenic effects [J].
Diamond, ML ;
Gingrich, SE ;
Fertuck, K ;
McCarry, BE ;
Stern, GA ;
Billeck, B ;
Grift, B ;
Brooker, D ;
Yager, TD .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (14) :2900-2908
[7]   Foliar exchange of mercury as a function of soil and air mercury concentrations [J].
Ericksen, JA ;
Gustin, MS .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 324 (1-3) :271-279
[8]   Urban environmental mercury in Changchun, a metropolitan city in Northeastern China: source, cycle, and fate [J].
Fang, FM ;
Wang, QC ;
Li, JF .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 330 (1-3) :159-170
[9]   Total gaseous mercury in the atmosphere of Guiyang, PR China [J].
Feng, XB ;
Tang, SL ;
Shang, LH ;
Yan, HY ;
Sommar, J ;
Lindqvist, O .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 304 (1-3) :61-72
[10]   Principal biogeochemical factors affecting the speciation and transport of mercury through the terrestrial environment [J].
Gabriel, MC ;
Williamson, DG .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 2004, 26 (04) :421-434