The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform

被引:390
作者
Ihlanfeldt, KR [1 ]
Sjoquist, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sch Policy Studies, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
labor market; discrimination; welfare;
D O I
10.1080/10511482.1998.9521321
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In 1992, Housing Policy Debate published John Kain's comprehensive review of the extensive scholarly literature on the spatial mismatch hypothesis. This hypothesis maintains that the suburbanization of jobs and involuntary housing market segregation have acted together to create a surplus of workers relative to the number of available jobs in submetropolitan areas where blacks are concentrated. Since Kain's review, more than two dozen new studies; on the spatial mismatch hypothesis have been completed. Generally, these studies use more suitable data and superior methodologies than earlier studies and therefore provide the most reliable evidence to date on the spatial mismatch hypothesis. This article critically reviews the new studies and assesses what implications can be drawn for welfare reform.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 892
页数:44
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   THE CHANGING GEOGRAPHY OF METROPOLITAN OPPORTUNITY - THE SEGREGATION OF THE POOR IN US METROPOLITAN-AREAS, 1970 TO 1990 [J].
ABRAMSON, AJ ;
TOBIN, MS ;
VANDERGOOT, MR .
HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, 1995, 6 (01) :45-72
[2]  
*AM PUBL TRANS ASS, 1994, ACC OPP LINK INN WOR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, WORK DISAPPEARS
[4]   Economic theory and the spatial mismatch hypothesis [J].
Arnott, R .
URBAN STUDIES, 1998, 35 (07) :1171-1185
[5]  
BELL D, 1974, PATTERNS RACIAL DISC, V1, P55
[6]  
Block F., 1994, ANTIDISCRIMINATION L
[7]  
Blumenberg E, 1998, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V17, P639, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199823)17:4<639::AID-PAM3>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-I
[9]  
BRUECKNER J, 1995, UNPUB SPATIAL MISMAT
[10]   What spatial mismatch? The proximity of blacks to employment in Boston and Houston [J].
Cohn, S ;
Fossett, M .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1996, 75 (02) :557-573