The moral status of preferences for directed donation: Who should decide who gets transplantable organs?

被引:16
作者
Ankeny, RA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Unit Hist & Philosophy Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S096318010100408X
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 398
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   From Pittsburgh to Cleveland: NHBD controversies and bioethics [J].
Agich, GJ .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 1999, 8 (03) :269-274
[2]   Recasting the debate on multiple listing for transplantation through consideration of both principles and practice [J].
Ankeny, RA .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 1999, 8 (03) :330-339
[3]  
ANKENY RA, 1996, THEORETICAL MED, V17, P45
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, UNOS UPD AUG, P20
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1973, UTILITARIANISM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, WORLD GOODS
[7]   DIRECTED DONATION - THE RELEVANCE OF RACE [J].
ARNASON, WB .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1991, 21 (06) :13-19
[8]  
ARNOLD RM, 1995, PROCURING ORGANS TRN
[9]  
BARNETT AH, 1993, ISSUES LAW MED, V9, P117
[10]  
*DEP HHS OFF INSP, 1998, RAC GEOGR DISP DISTR