Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?

被引:285
作者
Bornmann, L
Daniel, HD
机构
[1] ETH, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Evaluat Off, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Research Fellowship; Scientific Output;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-005-0281-4
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Hirsch (2005) has proposed the h-index as a single-number criterion to evaluate the scientific output of a researcher (Ball, 2005): A scientist has index h if h of his/her N-p papers have at least h citations each, and the other (N-p - h) papers have fewer than h citations each. In a study on committee peer review (Bornmann & Daniel, 2005) we found that on average the h-index for successful applicants for post-doctoral research fellowships was consistently higher than for non-successful applicants.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 392
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Index aims for fair ranking of scientists [J].
Ball, P .
NATURE, 2005, 436 (7053) :900-900
[2]  
Bornmann L, 2005, ISSI 2005: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P343
[3]  
COLE S, 1989, TRENDS BIOCHEM SCI, V14, P9
[4]  
FROHLICH H, 2001, BIF FUTURA, V16, P69
[5]  
Hirsch J.E., 2005, An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output