Changes in the management and outcome of rectal cancer over a 10-year period in Oxford

被引:4
作者
Chambers, W. [1 ]
Hancock, L. [1 ]
McKenzie, R. [1 ]
Buchel, O. [1 ]
Lindsey, I. [1 ]
Cunningham, C. [1 ]
George, B. [1 ]
Mortensen, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
关键词
Rectal cancer; chemoradiation; MRI; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; ANTERIOR RESECTION; CARCINOMA; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02360.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim The changes in the management and outcome of rectal cancer in Oxford were studied over a 10-year period. Method Rectal cancer data using a prospectively collected data base were divided into curative (global) and palliative groups. The global curative group was further divided into those with and without (selected group) the following features: emergency cases, local excision, salvage surgery for recurrence or incomplete local excision, metastatic disease, perioperative death, hereditary cancer, inflammatory bowel disease-related cancer, and synchronous cancer. Results Between 1994 and 2003, 709 cases of rectal cancer were treated, 532 for cure and a selected group of 393 after removing patients with the aforementioned exclusions. For the selected group, the average follow-up was 51.2 months, overall survival 65.4% and cancer-specific survival 75.3%. There was no 2-year survival difference between each of the 10-year periods of study. Two-year local recurrence was 5.6% for the first 5-year period and 2.3% for the second (P = 0.11). MRI staging increased during the 10 years (0% in 1994; 66.7% in 2003) as did use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) (0% in 1994; 64.7% in 2003). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly higher in the second 5-year period (2.6% vs 9.6%; P = 0.01). Conclusion Despite increasing use of MRI and dCRT, 2-year survival and local recurrence were not significantly different within the 10 years studied.
引用
收藏
页码:1004 / 1008
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Birbeck, KF ;
Macklin, CP ;
Tiffin, NJ ;
Parsons, W ;
Dixon, MF ;
Mapstone, NP ;
Abbott, CR ;
Scott, N ;
Finan, PJ ;
Johnston, D ;
Quirke, P .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) :449-457
[2]  
CEDERMARK B, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P2269, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2269::AID-CNCR2820750913>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-I
[4]   Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer [J].
Kapiteijn, E ;
Marijnen, CAM ;
Nagtegaal, ID ;
Putter, H ;
Steup, WH ;
Wiggers, T ;
Rutten, HJT ;
Pahlman, L ;
Glimelius, B ;
van Krieken, JHJM ;
Leer, JWH ;
van de Velde, CJH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (09) :638-646
[5]   LEAKAGE FROM STAPLED LOW ANASTOMOSIS AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM [J].
KARANJIA, ND ;
CORDER, AP ;
BEARN, P ;
HEALD, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (08) :1224-1226
[6]   LONG-TERM RESULTS OF ANTERIOR RESECTION USING THE DOUBLE-STAPLING TECHNIQUE [J].
LAXAMANA, A ;
SOLOMON, MJ ;
COHEN, Z ;
FEINBERG, SM ;
STERN, HS ;
MCLEOD, RS .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (12) :1246-1250
[7]  
Martling A, 2001, CANCER, V92, P896, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<896::AID-CNCR1398>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-R
[9]  
Pahlman L, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P980
[10]  
PAKKASTIE TE, 1994, EUR J SURG, V160, P293