Effect of periprostatic nerve blockade before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on patient comfort: A randomized placebo controlled study

被引:27
作者
Inal, G [1 ]
Yazici, S [1 ]
Adsan, O [1 ]
Ozturk, B [1 ]
Kosan, M [1 ]
Cetinkaya, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Urol 2, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
anesthesia; biopsy; pain; prostate;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2003.00768.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In the present study, we assessed the efficacy and morbidity of periprostatic local anesthesia before transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate. Methods: From August 2001 to February 2002, 98 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy at the Department of 2nd Urology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Ninety patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 received no local anesthesia, while group 2 received a periprostatic saline injection 5 min before the biopsy and group 3 received periprostatic local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine. Pain-scale responses were analyzed for each aspect of the biopsy procedure using a visual analog scale. Results: There were no differences in pain scores between the three groups during digital rectal examination, intramuscular injection and probe insertion. Mean pain scores during needle insertion in groups 1, 2 and 3 were 5.65 +/- 2.35, 6.25 +/- 2.04 and 3.16 +/- 2.14, respectively. There was no significant difference between the pain scores of groups 1 and 2, whereas pain scores decreased significantly in group 3. Conclusion: Periprostatic local anesthesia before prostate biopsy is a safe and easy method to increase patient comfort during the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 151
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods [J].
Alavi, AS ;
Soloway, MS ;
Vaidya, A ;
Lynne, CM ;
Gheiler, EL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04) :1343-1345
[2]   SEDOANALGESIA IN UROLOGY - A SAFE, COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO GENERAL-ANESTHESIA - A REVIEW OF 1020 CASES [J].
BIRCH, BRP ;
ANSON, KM ;
MILLER, RA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 66 (04) :342-350
[3]   Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: Results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial [J].
Chang, SS ;
Alberts, G ;
Wells, N ;
Smith, JA ;
Cookson, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2178-2180
[4]   SIDE-EFFECTS AND PATIENT ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSRECTAL BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE [J].
CLEMENTS, R ;
AIDEYAN, OU ;
GRIFFITHS, GJ ;
PEELING, WB .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 47 (02) :125-126
[5]   MULTIPLE TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATIC BIOPSIES - TRUE MORBIDITY AND PATIENT ACCEPTANCE [J].
COLLINS, GN ;
LLOYD, SN ;
HEHIR, M ;
MCKELVIE, GB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 71 (04) :460-463
[6]   PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A CLINICAL UROLOGICAL PRACTICE BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN [J].
COONER, WH ;
MOSLEY, BR ;
RUTHERFORD, CL ;
BEARD, JH ;
POND, HS ;
TERRY, WJ ;
IGEL, TC ;
KIDD, DD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (06) :1146-1154
[7]   Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Eskew, LA ;
Bare, RL ;
McCullough, DL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :199-202
[8]   A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: The Emory University experience [J].
Issa, MM ;
Bux, S ;
Chun, T ;
Petros, JA ;
Labadia, AJ ;
Anastasia, K ;
Miller, LE ;
Marshall, FF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) :397-399
[9]   Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate [J].
Nash, PA ;
Bruce, JE ;
Indudhara, R ;
Shinohara, K .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (02) :607-609
[10]  
Nova L, 1997, J UROL S, V157, P59