Psychometric analysis of the UK health and Safety Executive's Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool

被引:158
作者
Edwards, Julian A. [1 ]
Webster, Simon [2 ]
Van Laar, Darren [3 ]
Easton, Simon [3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Sch Business, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Hlth & Safety Execut, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Dept Psychol, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
work-related stress; confirmatory factor analysis; psychometrics; Health and Safety Executive; Indicator Tool; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1080/02678370802166599
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Numerous tools have been developed that attempt to measure work-related stress and working conditions, but few practical instruments in the literature have been found to have a reliable psychometric factor structure. In the UK, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Management Standards (MS) Indicator Tool is increasingly used by organizations to monitor working conditions that can lead to stress. In Health and Safety Executive (2004), a factor analysis was conducted demonstrating the reliability of the scales. However, the authors acknowledged that direct reassessment of the same factor structure was impossible as the questionnaire was split into two separate modules for data collection. Furthermore, the tool is designed to enable comparisons between as well as within organizations to take place, yet reliability has only previously been tested at the individual level. The current study is the first to examine the factor structure of the HSE MS Indicator Tool using organizational-level data. Data collected from 39 UK organizations (N=26,382) was used to perform a first-order Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on the original 35-item seven-factor measurement scale. The results showed an acceptable fit to the data for the instrument. A second-order CFA was also performed to test if the Indicator Tool contains a higher order uni-dimensional measure of work-related stress. These findings also revealed an acceptable fit to the data, suggesting that it may be possible to derive a single measure of work-related stress. Normative data comprising tables of percentiles from the organizational data are provided to enable employers to compare their organizational averages against national benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 107
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ADAMS WJ, 1978, LIFE TIMES CENTRAL L
[2]  
Arbuckle J.L., 1999, AMOS 40 USERS GUIDE
[3]  
Cooper C.L., 1988, Occupational stress indicator: Management guide
[4]   'Management Standards' work-related stress in the UK: Practical development [J].
Cousins, R ;
Mackay, CJ ;
Clarke, SD ;
Kelly, C ;
Kelly, PJ ;
McCaig, RH .
WORK AND STRESS, 2004, 18 (02) :113-136
[5]  
DeVellis RF., 2003, SCALE DEV
[6]  
*HLTH SAF EX, 2006, SELF REP WORK REL IL
[7]  
*HLTH SAF EX, 2004, PSYCH WORK COND GREA
[8]  
IVANCEVIC JM, 1980, STRESS WORK
[9]   JOB DEMANDS, JOB DECISION LATITUDE, AND MENTAL STRAIN - IMPLICATIONS FOR JOB REDESIGN [J].
KARASEK, RA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1979, 24 (02) :285-308
[10]   Does the 'Management Standards' approach meet the standard? [J].
Kompier, M .
WORK AND STRESS, 2004, 18 (02) :137-139