Daptomycin for treating infected diabetic foot ulcers: evidence from a randomized, controlled trial comparing daptomycin with vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins for complicated skin and skin-structure infections

被引:129
作者
Lipsky, BA [1 ]
Stoutenburgh, U
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Gen Internal Med Clin, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[3] Cubist Pharmaceut Inc, Lexington, MA USA
关键词
diabetic ulcers; foot infections; soft tissue infections; antibiotic resistance; Gram-positive infections;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkh531
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: The predominant pathogens causing diabetic foot infections are Gram-positive cocci, many of which are now resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Daptomycin is a new agent that is active against most Gram-positive pathogens. To compare the effectiveness of daptomycin against semi-synthetic penicillins or vancomycin, we analysed the subset of diabetic patients with an infected ulcer enrolled in two randomized, controlled investigator-blind trials of patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections presumptively caused by Gram-positive organisms. Patients and methods: Patients with a diabetic ulcer infection were prospectively stratified to ensure they were equally represented in the treatment groups, then randomized to either daptomycin [4 mg/kg every 24 h intravenously (iv)] or a pre-selected comparator (vancomycin or a semi-synthetic penicillin) for 7-14 days. Results: Among 133 patients with a diabetic ulcer infection, 103 were clinically evaluable; 47 received daptomycin and 56 received a comparator. Most infections were monomicrobial, and Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant pathogen. Success rates for patients treated with daptomycin or the comparators were not statistically different for clinical (66% versus 70%, respectively; 95% CI, -14.4, 21.8) or microbiological (overall or by pathogen) outcomes. Both treatments were generally well tolerated, with most adverse events of mild to moderate severity. Conclusions: The clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of daptomycin were similar to those of commonly used comparator antibiotics for treating infected diabetic foot ulcers caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Daptomycin should be considered for treating these infections, especially those caused by resistant Gram-positive pathogens.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 245
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
American Diabetes Association, 1999, DIABETES CARE, V22, P1354, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.22.8.1354
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, MMWR Recomm Rep, V44, P1
[3]   The safety and efficacy of daptomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections [J].
Arbeit, RD ;
Maki, D ;
Tally, FP ;
Campanaro, E ;
Eisenstein, BI .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (12) :1673-1681
[4]   Daptomycin: Another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens [J].
Carpenter, CF ;
Chambers, HF .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (07) :994-1000
[5]  
*CDCP, 2002, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V51, P902
[6]   Bactericidal activities of daptomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations [J].
Cha, R ;
Brown, WJ ;
Rybak, MJ .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (12) :3960-3963
[7]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the diabetic foot clinic:: a worsening problem [J].
Dang, CN ;
Prasad, YDM ;
Boulton, AJM ;
Jude, EB .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (02) :159-161
[8]   Antimicrobial resistance trends and outbreak frequency in United States hospitals [J].
Diekema, DJ ;
BootsMiller, BJ ;
Vaughn, TE ;
Woolson, RF ;
Yankey, JW ;
Ernst, EJ ;
Flach, SD ;
Ward, MM ;
Franciscus, CLJ ;
Pfaller, MA ;
Doebbeling, BN .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 38 (01) :78-85
[9]   Staphylococcal resistance revisited:: community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus -: an emerging problem for the management of skin and soft tissue infections [J].
Eady, EA ;
Cove, JH .
CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 16 (02) :103-124
[10]  
Fejfarova V, 2002, Vnitr Lek, V48, P302