Receptivity to Taboka and Camel Snus in a US test market

被引:49
作者
Biener, Lois [1 ]
Bogen, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Survey Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02125 USA
关键词
SMOKELESS TOBACCO USE; PUBLIC-HEALTH; SMOKING; TRENDS; SWEDEN; HARM;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntp113
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
The two largest U.S. cigarette manufacturers introduced Swedish-style low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco (snus) to several U.S. test markets in summer 2006. Since then, snus brands and test markets have proliferated. This article assesses consumer response by analyzing data from the 2006 and 2007 Indiana Adult Tobacco Survey (IATS), a statewide telephone survey of 3,544 adults. During those years, the IATS included questions on awareness and trial of Camel Snus and Taboka. Analyses examined rates and predictors of awareness and trial statewide, and within the central Indiana test market. Nineteen percent of Indiana adults were aware of either Taboka or Camel Snus in 2006 and 2007. Estimates are larger (29%) for central Indiana and larger still (70%) for central Indiana smokers. Trial of snus, however, was very low (1.5% statewide), except among male smokers in central Indiana, 20% of whom are estimated to have tried it. Multivariate analyses showed that trial was more likely among men than women (odds ratio [OR] 13.85), residents of central Indiana than those farther from Indianapolis (OR 2.96), recipients than nonrecipients of tobacco promotions (OR 6.08), and those believing that smokeless tobacco is less harmful than cigarettes compared with those who believe it is equally or more harmful (OR 3.86). Results from this study suggest substantial initial interest in the new products among male smokers in this test market, especially those who receive promotional mailings from tobacco companies, which often include coupons for free or discounted products.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1159
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SMOK TOB SOM TOB SPE
[2]   European Union policy on smokeless tobacco:: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health [J].
Bates, C ;
Fagerström, K ;
Jarvis, MJ ;
Kunze, M ;
McNeill, A ;
Ramström, L .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (04) :360-367
[3]  
CLARK PI, 2007, SOC RES NIC TOB AUST
[4]  
CNATTINGIUS S, 2005, HALSORISKER MED SVEN
[5]   Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden [J].
Foulds, J ;
Ramstrom, L ;
Burke, M ;
Fagerström, K .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (04) :349-359
[6]   Smokeless tobacco use: harm reduction or induction approach? [J].
Hatsukami, DK ;
Lemmonds, C ;
Tomar, SL .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (03) :309-317
[7]   Exposure to nicotine and a tobacco-specific carcinogen increase with duration of use of smokeless tobacco [J].
Hecht, S. S. ;
Carmella, S. G. ;
Edmonds, A. ;
Murphy, S. E. ;
Stepanov, I. ;
Luo, X. ;
Hatsukami, D. K. .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2008, 17 (02) :128-131
[8]  
HELLIKER K, 2006, WALL STREET J 0916
[9]  
*IN TOB PREV CESS, 2007, OUR WAY HLTH IND 200
[10]   Not safe is not enough: smokers have a right to know more than there is no safe tobacco product [J].
Kozlowski, LT ;
Edwards, BQ .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2005, 14 :II3-II7