Sunk costs, entry deterrence, and financial constraints

被引:7
作者
Arping, Stefan [1 ]
Diaw, Khaled M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business, Finance Grp, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Europe Econ, Chancery House, London WC2A 1QU, England
关键词
sunk costs; irreversible investment; entry deterrence; financial constraints;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.01.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies how sunk costs affect a financially constrained incumbent's ability to deter entry into its market. Sunk costs make it less attractive to the incumbent to accommodate entry by liquidating assets in place and exiting the market. This may render entry by a prospective rival unprofitable, and thereby facilitate entry deterrence. However, sunk costs also make it harder for the incumbent to pledge valuable collateral to outside investors. To make up for the poor collateral value, the incumbent will have to give stronger liquidation rights to its lenders. Consequently, a larger fraction of the incumbent's assets will be liquidated in the event of a liquidity default. This potentially creates room for profitable entry. The overall effect of sunk costs on the incumbent's ability to deter entry into its market is thus ambiguous. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 501
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Capacity precommitment as a barrier to entry: A Bertrand-Edgeworth approach [J].
Allen, B ;
Deneckere, R ;
Faith, T ;
Kovenock, D .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2000, 15 (03) :501-530
[2]   CORPORATE LIQUIDITY IN GAMES OF MONOPOLY POWER [J].
BASKIN, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (02) :312-319
[3]   SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM INTERESTS - CAPITAL STRUCTURE WITH MULTIPLE INVESTORS [J].
BERGLOF, E ;
VONTHADDEN, EL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :1055-1084
[4]  
BOLTON P, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P93
[5]   Optimal debt structure and the number of creditors [J].
Bolton, P ;
Scharfstein, DS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1996, 104 (01) :1-25
[6]  
BRANDER JA, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P956
[7]   HOLDING IDLE CAPACITY TO DETER ENTRY [J].
BULOW, J ;
GEANAKOPLOS, J ;
KLEMPERER, P .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1985, 95 (377) :178-182
[8]   Dynamic adverse selection and debt [J].
Chemla, G ;
Faure-Grimaud, A .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 45 (09) :1773-1792
[9]   FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION AND DELEGATED MONITORING [J].
DIAMOND, DW .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1984, 51 (03) :393-414
[10]   ROLE OF INVESTMENT IN ENTRY-DETERRENCE [J].
DIXIT, A .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1980, 90 (357) :95-106