Composite auction method for suppressing unreasonable electricity price spikes in a competitive electricity market

被引:12
作者
Duan, G [1 ]
Dong, ZY
Wang, XF
机构
[1] Beijing Sifang Automat Co Ltd, Software Ctr, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1049/ip-gtd:20045055
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 [电气工程]; 0809 [电子科学与技术];
摘要
The existence of undesirable electricity price spikes in a competitive electricity market requires an efficient auction mechanism. However, many of the existing auction mechanism have difficulties in suppressing such unreasonable price spikes effectively. A new auction mechanism is proposed to suppress effectively unreasonable price spikes in a competitive electricity market. It optimally combines system marginal price auction and pay as bid auction mechanisms. A threshold value is determined to activate the switching between the marginal price auction and the proposed composite auction. Basically when the system marginal price is higher than the threshold value, the composite auction for high price electricity market is activated. The winning electricity sellers will sell their electricity at the system marginal price or their own bid prices, depending on their rights of being paid at the system marginal price and their offers' impact on suppressing undesirable price spikes. Such economic stimuli discourage sellers from practising economic and physical withholdings. Multiple price caps are proposed to regulate strong market power. We also compare other auction mechanisms to highlight the characteristics of the proposed one. Numerical simulation using the proposed auction mechanism is given to illustrate the procedure of this new auction mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 468
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Experimental analysis of the efficiency of uniform-price versus discriminatory auctions in the England and Wales electricity market [J].
Bower, J ;
Bunn, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2001, 25 (3-4) :561-592
[2]
BURNS P, 2001, FRONT EC AUG
[3]
DAVID LR, 2000, J ECON PERSPECT, V14, P183
[4]
*DEP MARK AN CAL I, 2001, REP REAL TIM SUPPL C
[5]
FABRA N, 2002, DESIGNING ELECT AUCT
[6]
Fabra N, 2002, Electr J, V15, P72
[7]
FEDERICO G, BINDING ELECT PAY BI
[8]
Evaluation of a truthful revelation auction in the context of energy markets with nonconcave benefits [J].
Hobbs, BF ;
Rothkopf, MH ;
Hyde, LC ;
O'Neill, RP .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2000, 18 (01) :5-32
[9]
LIU YA, 2001, ELECT POWER, V38, P67
[10]
*OFF GAS EL MARK O, 1999, NEW EL TRAD ARR, V1