Second primary cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer - A SEER analysis of brachytherapy versus external beam radiotherapy

被引:84
作者
Abdel-Wahab, May [1 ]
Reis, Isildinha M. [2 ,3 ]
Hamilton, Kara [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Div Biostat, Miller Sch Med, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
second primary cancer; brachytherapy; prostate cancer; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.043
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the incidence of second primary cancers (SPCs) and radiotherapy-induced SPCs (RTSPCs). Patients and Methods: The incidence of SPCs and RTSPCs was compared among four treatment groups with locoregional prostate adenocarcinoma in the 1973-2002 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. These groups were no radiotherapy (RT), no surgery (Group 1); external beam RT (EBRT) (Group 2); brachytherapy (Group 3); and a combination of ERRT and brachytherapy (Group 4). Results: The age-adjusted estimates of SPCs were greater with EBRT than with brachytherapy (2,178 vs. 1,901 SPCs/100,000; p = 0.025) or with the no RT, no surgery group (1,971 SPCs/100,000; p < 0.0001). The age-adjusted rate of late SPC (>= 5 years) for EBRT (2,425 SPCs/100,000) was only significantly greater (p < 0.0001) than that for no RT, no surgery (1,950 SPCs/100,000). The hazard ratio adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and grade was constant at 1.263 for EBRT compared with no RT, no surgery (p < 0.0001) but varied with the length of follow-up in both the brachytherapy (0.721 at 5 years to 1.200 at 9 years) and combination (0.920 at 5 years to 1.317 at 9 years) groups. The incidence of RTSPCs was only significantly different between the no RT, no surgery group and the EBRT group, with an increase of 162 cases/100,000 or a 0.16% increased SPC risk (p = 0.023). No significant differences in the incidence of RTSPC were seen between the RT groups. Conclusion: No significant differences were seen in the incidence of RTSPCs between the RT groups. The initial smaller relative risk of overall SPCs in the brachytherapy group increased with time until the curves converged, suggesting that the effect had resulted from patient selection bias. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 68
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Second cancers are killing us! [J].
Alberts, David S. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (11) :2019-2019
[2]   The risk of radiation-induced cancer in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and its results of treatment [J].
Amemiya, K ;
Shibuya, H ;
Yoshimura, R ;
Okada, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (935) :1028-1033
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]  
Brenner DJ, 2000, CANCER, V88, P398, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<398::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-V
[6]  
CAHAN WG, 1948, CANCER, V1, P3, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(194805)1:1<3::AID-CNCR2820010103>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-7
[8]   Bladder cancer risk following primary and adjuvant external beam radiation for prostate cancer [J].
Chrouser, K ;
Leibovich, B ;
Bergstralh, E ;
Zincke, H ;
Blute, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (01) :107-110
[9]  
Collett D, 2014, MODELLING SURVIVAL D
[10]   A teachable moment for oncologists: Cancer survivors, 10 million strong and growing! [J].
Ganz, PA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) :5458-5460