Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services

被引:103
作者
Adame, M. F. [1 ,2 ]
Hermoso, V. [1 ]
Perhans, K. [3 ]
Lovelock, C. E. [3 ]
Herrera-Silveira, J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] IPN, Ctr Invest & Estudios Avanzados CINVESTAV, Unidad Merida, Yuc 97310, Mexico
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
carbon stocks; hurricanes; mangroves; Marxan; rehabilitation; water quality; wetlands; MANGROVE FORESTS; BIOMASS; BIODIVERSITY; PROTECTION; VEGETATION; PATTERNS; EXCHANGE; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12391
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Selection of areas for restoration should be based on cost-effectiveness analysis to attain the maximum benefit with a limited budget and overcome the traditional ad hoc allocation of funds for restoration projects. Restoration projects need to be planned on the basis of ecological knowledge and economic and social constraints. We devised a novel approach for selecting cost-effective areas for restoration on the basis of biodiversity and potential provision of 3 ecosystem services: carbon storage, water depuration, and coastal protection. We used Marxan, a spatial prioritization tool, to balance the provision of ecosystem services against the cost of restoration. We tested this approach in a mangrove ecosystem in the Caribbean. Our approach efficiently selected restoration areas that at low cost were compatible with biodiversity targets and that maximized the provision of one or more ecosystem services. Choosing areas for restoration of mangroves on the basis carbon storage potential, largely guaranteed the restoration of biodiversity and other ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 502
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Carbon Stocks of Tropical Coastal Wetlands within the Karstic Landscape of the Mexican Caribbean [J].
Adame, Maria Fernanda ;
Kauffman, J. Boone ;
Medina, Israel ;
Gamboa, Julieta N. ;
Torres, Olmo ;
Caamal, Juan P. ;
Reza, Miriam ;
Herrera-Silveira, Jorge A. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02)
[2]   Effect of geomorphological setting and rainfall on nutrient exchange in mangroves during tidal inundation [J].
Adame, Maria Fernanda ;
Virdis, Bernardino ;
Lovelock, Catherine E. .
MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2010, 61 (10) :1197-1206
[3]   Carbon payments for mangrove conservation: ecosystem constraints and uncertainties of sequestration potential [J].
Alongi, Daniel M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (04) :462-470
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1974, ANNU REV ECOL SYST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5
[6]  
[Anonymous], ROO INGENERIA REV AC
[7]   Valuing ecosystem functions: An empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India [J].
Badola, R ;
Hussain, SA .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 32 (01) :85-92
[8]   Regeneration in fringe mangrove forests damaged by Hurricane Andrew [J].
Baldwin, A ;
Egnotovich, M ;
Ford, M ;
Platt, W .
PLANT ECOLOGY, 2001, 157 (02) :149-162
[9]  
Ball I.R., 2009, Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation
[10]   Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services [J].
Balvanera, P ;
Daily, GC ;
Ehrlich, PR ;
Ricketts, TH ;
Bailey, SA ;
Kark, S ;
Kremen, C ;
Pereira, H .
SCIENCE, 2001, 291 (5511) :2047-2047