Public land leasing and the changing roles of local government in urban China

被引:54
作者
Deng, FF [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Real Estate, Sch Design & Environm, Singapore 117566, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00168-005-0241-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since late 1980s China's urban land use began to change from administrative allocation to public land leasing. Based on the assumptions of fiscal decentralization and growth of private economy, this paper provides another perspective on public land leasing in addition to the well-known efficiency of market allocation of land resource. My focus is on the endogenous evolution of local public finance due to rent capitalization. Especially, I model a two-sector urban economy and a multi-task local government that allocates its effort to maximize fiscal revenue. The findings indicate that complete wage capitalization under administrative allocation of land contributes to the pressure on local governments to look for alternative revenue source. Public land leasing helps to include private firms into local public finance and re-orient local governments' interest from SOEs to public goods provision. A simple test on the institutional change shows the efficiency of public land leasing relative to the old system.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 373
页数:21
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CHIN REV MOB TAX POL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1945, The Road to Serfdom
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, The China Quarterly, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0009443901000195
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GROWING OUT PLAN CHI
[5]  
AU CC, 2002, 8707 NBER
[6]  
BERTAUD A, 1994, CITIES LAND MARKETS
[7]   A CRITIQUE OF TIEBOUT THEORY OF LOCAL PUBLIC-EXPENDITURES [J].
BEWLEY, TF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1981, 49 (03) :713-740
[8]  
Brennan Geoffrey, 1980, The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution
[9]   PROPERTY VALUE MAXIMIZATION AND PUBLIC-SECTOR EFFICIENCY [J].
BRUECKNER, JK .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1983, 14 (01) :1-15
[10]   THE IMPACT OF THE 2-TIER PLAN MARKET SYSTEM IN CHINESE-INDUSTRY [J].
BYRD, WA .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 1987, 11 (03) :295-308