Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

被引:204
作者
Bornmann, Lutz [1 ]
Mutz, Ruediger [1 ]
Daniel, Hans-Dieter [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ETH, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Evaluat Off, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
meta-analysis; grant peer review; gender bias; gender effect; gender differences;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2007.03.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Narrative reviews of peer review research have concluded that there is negligible evidence of gender bias in the awarding of grants based on peer review. Here, we report the findings of a meta-analysis of 21 studies providing, to the contrary, evidence of robust gender differences in grant award procedures. Even though the estimates of the gender effect vary substantially from study to study, the model estimation shows that all in all, among grant applicants men have statistically significant greater odds of receiving grants than women by about 7%. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 238
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STAT STAT SOFTW REL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, C&H TEXT STAT SCI
[3]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY HIGHER ED
[4]  
[Anonymous], GEND DIFF CAR AC SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHY SO SLOW ADVANCEM, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/7235.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PARTICIPATION WOMEN
[7]  
Biagioli Mario., 2002, EMERGENCE, V12, P11, DOI DOI 10.1080/1045722022000003435
[8]   Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions [J].
Bornmann, L ;
Daniel, HD .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 63 (02) :297-320
[9]  
Cole S., 1992, Making science: Between nature and society
[10]   REPORT OF THE AD-HOC-COMMITTEE-ON-DOUBLE-BLIND-REFEREEING [J].
COX, D ;
GLESER, L ;
PERLMAN, M ;
REID, N ;
ROEDER, K .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 8 (03) :310-317