Are swine workers in the United States at increased risk of infection with zoonotic influenza virus?

被引:150
作者
Myers, KP
Olsen, CW
Setterquist, SF
Capuano, AW
Donham, KJ
Thacker, EL
Merchant, JA
Gray, GC
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Ctr Emergency Infect Dis, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat & Environm Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Vet Med Res Inst, Ames, IA USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Vet Med, Dept Pathobiol Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/498977
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Pandemic influenza strains originate in nonhuman species. Pigs have an important role in interspecies transmission of the virus. We examined multiple swine-exposed human populations in the nation's number 1 swine-producing state for evidence of previous swine influenza virus infection. Methods. We performed controlled, cross-sectional seroprevalence studies among 111 farmers, 97 meat processing workers, 65 veterinarians, and 79 control subjects using serum samples collected during the period of 2002-2004. Serum samples were tested using a hemagglutination inhibition assay against the following 6 influenza A virus isolates collected recently from pigs and humans: A/Swine/WI/238/97 (H1N1), A/Swine/ WI/R33F/01 (H1N2), A/Swine/Minnesota/593/99 (H3N2), A/NewCaledonia/20/99 ( H1N1), A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2), and A/Nanchang/933/95 (H3N2). Results. Using multivariable proportional odds modeling, all 3 exposed study groups demonstrated markedly elevated titers against the H1N1 and H1N2 swine influenza virus isolates, compared with control subjects. Farmers had the strongest indication of exposure to swine H1N1 virus infection (odds ratio [OR], 35.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-161.8), followed by veterinarians ( OR, 17.8; 95% CI, 3.8-82.7), and meat processing workers (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.4-29.5). Similarly, farmers had the highest odds for exposure to swine H1N2 virus ( OR, 13.8; 95% CI,5.4-35.4), followed by veterinarians (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 3.6-24.6) and meat processing workers (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.7). Conclusions. Occupational exposure to pigs greatly increases workers' risk of swine influenza virus infection.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 20
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STAT COUNTR QUICKF
[2]   Serologic evidence of human and swine influenza in Mayan persons [J].
Ayora-Talavera, G ;
Cadavieco-Burgos, JM ;
Canul-Armas, AB .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 11 (01) :158-160
[3]   Phylogenetic analysis of H1N2 isolates of influenza A virus from pigs in the United States [J].
Choi, YK ;
Goyal, SM ;
Farnham, MW ;
Joo, HS .
VIRUS RESEARCH, 2002, 87 (02) :173-179
[4]   Studies of H5N1 influenza virus infection of pigs by using viruses isolated in Vietnam and Thailand in 2004 [J].
Choi, YK ;
Nguyen, TD ;
Ozaki, H ;
Webby, RJ ;
Puthavathana, P ;
Buranathal, C ;
Chaisingh, A ;
Auewarakul, P ;
Hanh, NTH ;
Ma, SK ;
Hui, PY ;
Guan, Y ;
Peiris, JSM ;
Webster, RG .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2005, 79 (16) :10821-10825
[5]   Prevalence of swine influenza virus subtypes on swine farms in the United States [J].
Choi, YK ;
Goyal, SM ;
Joo, HS .
ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY, 2002, 147 (06) :1209-1220
[6]  
CROSBY A, 2003, AM FORGOTTENS PANDEM
[7]   SPORADIC OCCURRENCE OF ZOONOTIC SWINE INFLUENZA-VIRUS INFECTIONS [J].
DACSO, CC ;
COUCH, RB ;
SIX, HR ;
YOUNG, JF ;
QUARLES, JM ;
KASEL, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 20 (04) :833-835
[8]  
DEJONG JC, 1988, ANN INST PASTEUR VIR, V139, P429
[9]   INFLUENZA-VIRUS INFECTIONS IN SEATTLE FAMILIES, 1975-1979 .2. PATTERN OF INFECTION IN INVADED HOUSEHOLDS AND RELATION OF AGE AND PRIOR ANTIBODY TO OCCURRENCE OF INFECTION AND RELATED ILLNESS [J].
FOX, JP ;
COONEY, MK ;
HALL, CE ;
FOY, HM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1982, 116 (02) :228-242
[10]  
HAIYAN LI, 2004, PREV VET MED, V26, P1