Comparison of 7-day and repeated 24-h recall of type 2 diabetes

被引:14
作者
Bennett, A. V. [1 ]
Patrick, D. L. [2 ]
Bushnell, D. M. [3 ]
Chiou, C. F. [4 ]
Diehr, P. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Hlth Res Associates Inc, Mountlake Terrace, WA USA
[4] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Questionnaires; Mental recall; Validation studies; Diabetes mellitus type 2; Signs and symptoms; WEEKLY PAIN; PATIENT; DIARY; INCONTINENCE; VARIABILITY; PEAK;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-010-9791-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Patient reporting of type 2 diabetes symptoms in a questionnaire with a 7-day recall period was expected to be different from symptom reports using a 7-day diary with repeated 24-h recall based on cognitive theory of memory processes and prior literature. This study compared these two types of recall in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D). One hundred and forty adults with T2D completed a daily diary for 7 days containing 9 T2D-related symptom and impact items. On day 7, patients completed the same items with a 7-day recall period. We examined the concordance of 7-day recall with summary descriptors of the daily reports and compared the scores and the discriminant ability of 7-day recall and mean of daily reports. Seven-day recall was most concordant with the mean of daily reports. The average difference in scores was small (range 0.22-0.77 on 11-point scale) and less than 0.5 standard deviations. For some items, the difference was positively associated with the variation in daily reports. The discriminant ability was comparable. In this study population, a questionnaire with 7-day recall provided information consistent with a daily diary measure of the average week-long experience of T2D symptoms and impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 777
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2009 [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2009, 32 :S13-S61
[2]
[Anonymous], 2009, Fed Regist
[3]
BENNETT AV, 2010, COMPARISON IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCF.2010.08.008
[4]
REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHR, P ;
PATRICK, DL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S142-S158
[5]
COMPARISON OF SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES OF SEVERITY OF URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN WOMEN [J].
ELSER, DM ;
FANTL, JA ;
MCCLISH, DK ;
WYMAN, JF ;
BUMP, RC ;
FURBERG, C ;
LENTZ, SE ;
SCHUMAKER, SA ;
MORGAN, TM ;
ROBINSON, D ;
JAMES, P .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 1995, 14 (04) :311-316
[6]
Recall bias for seven-day recall measurement of alcohol consumption among emergency department patients: Implications for case-crossover designs [J].
Gmel, Gerhard ;
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS, 2007, 68 (02) :303-310
[7]
DEVELOPMENT OF A TYPE-2 DIABETES SYMPTOM CHECKLIST - A MEASURE OF SYMPTOM SEVERITY [J].
GROOTENHUIS, PA ;
SNOEK, FJ ;
HEINE, RJ ;
BOUTER, LM .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1994, 11 (03) :253-261
[8]
HILTON ME, 1989, BRIT J ADDICT, V84, P1085
[9]
Voiding and incontinence frequencies: Variability of diary data and required diary length [J].
Homma, Y ;
Ando, T ;
Yoshida, M ;
Kageyama, S ;
Takei, M ;
Kimoto, K ;
Ishizuka, O ;
Gotoh, M ;
Hashimoto, T .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2002, 21 (03) :204-209
[10]
Assessment methods for patient-reported outcomes [J].
Hufford, MR ;
Shiffman, S .
DISEASE MANAGEMENT & HEALTH OUTCOMES, 2003, 11 (02) :77-86