Regulating private infrastructure investment: Optimal pricing for access to essential facilities

被引:75
作者
Gans, JS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Business Sch, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Consumer Surplus; Optimal Price; Government Subsidy; Infrastructure Investment; Regulate Access;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011155312792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 [经济学];
摘要
This paper analyzes optimal pricing for access to essential facilities in a competitive environment. The focus is on investment incentive issues arising from regulation under complete information. To that end, examining the provision of a natural monopoly infrastructure with unlimited capacity, it is shown that the fixed component of a regulated access price can be structured so as to induce a "race" between market participants to provide the infrastructure. An appropriate pricing formula can ensure that a single firm chooses to invest at the socially optimal time (taking into account producer and consumer surplus) despite the immediate access granted to rivals and the non-existence of government subsidies. Under the optimal pricing formula, firms choose their investment timing based on their desire to pre-empt their rivals. This pricing formula is efficient (a two part tariff), implementable ex post, and robust to alternative methods of asset valuation (replacement or historical cost). When firms are not identical, the access pricing formula resembles, in equilibrium, a fully distributed cost methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 189
页数:23
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
The access pricing problem: A synthesis [J].
Armstrong, M ;
Doyle, C ;
Vickers, J .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 44 (02) :131-150
[2]
Armstrong M., 1994, Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British experience
[3]
Baumol W. J., 1987, PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR, V120, P16
[4]
Baumol W.J., 1994, COMPETITION LOCAL TE
[5]
UNCERTAINTY, INDUSTRIAL-STRUCTURE, AND THE SPEED OF R AND D [J].
DASGUPTA, P ;
STIGLITZ, J .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1980, 11 (01) :1-28
[6]
DEFONTENAY C, 2000, EXTENDING MARKET POW
[7]
WHY REGULATE UTILITIES [J].
DEMSETZ, H .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1968, 11 (APR) :55-65
[8]
PREEMPTION AND RENT EQUALIZATION IN THE ADOPTION OF NEW TECHNOLOGY [J].
FUDENBERG, D ;
TIROLE, J .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 52 (03) :383-401
[9]
Access regulation and the timing of infrastructure investment [J].
Gans, JS ;
Williams, PL .
ECONOMIC RECORD, 1999, 75 (229) :127-137
[10]
Incumbency and R&D incentives: Licensing the gale of creative destruction [J].
Gans, JS ;
Stern, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2000, 9 (04) :485-511