Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards

被引:828
作者
Cutter, Susan L. [1 ]
Finch, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Hazards & Vulnerabil Res Inst, Dept Geog, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
disasters; inequality;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0710375105
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
During the past four decades (1960-2000), the United States experienced major transformations in population size, development patterns, economic conditions, and social characteristics. These social, economic, and built-environment changes altered the American hazardscape in profound ways, with more people living in high-hazard areas than ever before. To improve emergency management, it is important to recognize the variability in the vulnerable populations exposed to hazards and to develop place-based emergency plans accordingly. The concept of social vulnerability identifies sensitive populations that may be less likely to respond to, cope with, and recover from a natural disaster. Social vulnerability is complex and dynamic, changing over space and through time. This paper presents empirical evidence on the spatial and temporal patterns in social vulnerability in the United States from 1960 to the present. Using counties as our study unit, we found that those components that consistently increased social vulnerability for all time periods were density (urban), race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The spatial patterning of social vulnerability, although initially concentrated in certain geographic regions, has become more dispersed over time. The national trend shows a steady reduction in social vulnerability, but there is considerable regional variability, with many counties increasing in social vulnerability during the past five decades.
引用
收藏
页码:2301 / 2306
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Vulnerability
    Adger, W. Neil
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03): : 268 - 281
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Living with Risk. A global review of disaster reduction initiatives
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment report
  • [4] LOCAL INDICATORS OF SPATIAL ASSOCIATION - LISA
    ANSELIN, L
    [J]. GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 27 (02) : 93 - 115
  • [5] Anselin L., 2003, GeoDa 0.9 user's guide. spatial analysis laboratory (SAL)
  • [6] Bankoff G., 2004, Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development, and people
  • [7] Birkmann J., 2007, MEASURING VULNERABIL
  • [8] Blaikie P., 1994, At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203714775
  • [9] The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation
    Brooks, N
    Adger, WN
    Kelly, PM
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (02): : 151 - 163
  • [10] Clark G.E., 1998, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V3, P59, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009609710795