Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation

被引:271
作者
Koryak, Oksana [1 ]
Lockett, Andy [2 ,3 ]
Hayton, James [2 ,3 ]
Nicolaou, Nicos [2 ,3 ]
Mole, Kevin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Bettany Ctr Entrepreneurship, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Enterprise Res Ctr, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
“创新英国”项目; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Ambidexterity; TMT; SME; Attention based view; STRATEGIC DECISION-PROCESSES; MANAGEMENT TEAM DIVERSITY; WORK GROUP DIVERSITY; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; MODERATING ROLE; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP; GROUP HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
120117 [社会管理工程];
摘要
We view ambidexterity as a paradox whereby its components, exploration and exploitation, generate persistent and conflicting demands on an organization. Drawing on the attention based view of the firm (ABV), we examine three antecedents of organizational ambidexterity that reflect ABV's three principles - the principle of focus of attention; the principle of situated attention; and the principle of structural distribution of attention. Specifically, we examine the influence of top management team (TMT) composition, whether or not the firm has a clear written vision, and the extent to which organizational attention is focused on investments in R&D, and continuous improvement. We empirically validate our model on a sample of 422 small and medium-sized enterprises in the UK and fmd that ambidexterity is supported by a blend of integration and differentiation approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 427
页数:15
相关论文
共 177 条
[1]
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]
Top Management Team Advice Seeking and Exploratory Innovation: The Moderating Role of TMT Heterogeneity [J].
Alexiev, Alexander S. ;
Jansen, Justin J. P. ;
Van den Bosch, Frans A. J. ;
Volberda, Henk W. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, 47 (07) :1343-1364
[3]
Amabile TM, 1998, HARVARD BUS REV, V76, P76
[4]
The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict [J].
Amason, AC ;
Sapienza, HJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (04) :495-516
[6]
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[7]
Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (01) :104-122
[8]
Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[9]
[Anonymous], 5 ENT RES CTR
[10]
Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity [J].
Auh, S ;
Menguc, B .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (12) :1652-1661