Management of emergency department patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: Needle aspiration or tube thoracostomy?

被引:47
作者
Zehtabchi, Shahriar [1 ]
Rios, Claritza L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.009
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The emergency management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is controversial. This evidence-based emergency medicine review evaluates the existing evidence about the efficacy and safety of needle aspiration in comparison to tube thoracostomy for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and other databases. We selected studies for inclusion in the review if the authors stated that they had randomly assigned hemodynamically stable patients with no underlying lung disease to needle aspiration or tube thoracostomy. The outcome measures of interest included admission rate, length of hospital stay, recurrence rate, failure rate of the procedure, dyspnea score during or after the procedure, pain score during or after the procedure, and complications. Results: Three randomized trials with acceptable quality standards met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between needle aspiration and tube thoracostomy when outcomes of immediate failure, 1-week failure, risk of complication, and 1-year recurrence rate were measured. Only 2 trials reported the rate of hospitalization; needle aspiration was associated with lower rates of hospitalization in both trials: relative risks of 0.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17 to 0.39) and 0.51 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.74). Length of hospital stay was lower in the needle aspiration groups in all 3 trials, with mean differences of -2.15 days (95% CI -0.99 to -3.30), -2.10 days (95% CI -0.57 to -3.63), and -1.10 days (95% CI -2.28 to 0.08), respectively. Needle aspiration was associated with less analgesia requirement in one trial and lower pain scores in another. Conclusion: The existing evidence indicates that needle aspiration is at least as safe and effective as tube thoracostomy for management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Additionally, needle aspiration carries the benefit of fewer hospital admissions and shorter length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   SPONTANEOUS PNEUMOTHORAX - COMPARISON OF THORACIC DRAINAGE VS IMMEDIATE OR DELAYED NEEDLE ASPIRATION [J].
ANDRIVET, P ;
DJEDAINI, K ;
TEBOUL, JL ;
BROCHARD, L ;
DREYFUSS, D .
CHEST, 1995, 108 (02) :335-339
[2]   Aspiration versus tube drainage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax:: a randomised study [J].
Ayed, AK ;
Chandrasekaran, C ;
Sukumar, M .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (03) :477-482
[3]   Management of spontaneous pneumothorax - An American College of Chest Physicians Delphi Consensus Statement [J].
Baumann, MH ;
Strange, C ;
Heffner, JE ;
Light, R ;
Kirby, TJ ;
Klein, J ;
Luketich, JD ;
Panacek, EA ;
Sahn, SA .
CHEST, 2001, 119 (02) :590-602
[4]   The clinician's perspective on pneumothorax management [J].
Baumann, MH ;
Strange, C .
CHEST, 1997, 112 (03) :822-828
[5]  
*BESTBETS, BEST EV TOP
[6]   Simple aspiration as initial treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: Results of 91 consecutive cases [J].
Chan, SSW ;
Lam, PKW .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 28 (02) :133-138
[7]   Primary spontaneous pneumothorax: 1-year recurrence rate after simple aspiration [J].
Chan, Stewart S. W. ;
Rainer, Timothy H. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 13 (02) :88-91
[8]   Can spontaneous pneumothorax patients be treated by ambulatory care management? [J].
Choi, Sung Hyuk ;
Lee, Sung Woo ;
Hong, Yun Sik ;
Kim, Su Jin ;
Moon, Jun Dong ;
Moon, Sung Woo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 31 (03) :491-495
[9]  
*CTR MED ED, EM MED ABSTR
[10]   Simple aspiration versus chest-tube insertion in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review [J].
Devanand, A ;
Koh, MS ;
Ong, TH ;
Low, SY ;
Phua, GC ;
Tan, KL ;
Eng, CTP ;
Samuel, M .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 (07) :579-590