A novel, cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naive adults

被引:59
作者
Artenstein, AW
Johnson, C
Marbury, TC
Morrison, D
Blum, PS
Kemp, T
Nichols, R
Balser, JP
Currie, M
Monath, TP
机构
[1] Acambis Inc, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Mem Hosp Rhode Isl, Ctr Biodef & Emerging Pathogens, Div Infect Dis, Pawtucket, RI 02860 USA
[3] PRA Int Inc, Lenexa, KS USA
[4] Orlando Clin Res Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[5] BioKinet Clin Applicat, Springfield, MO USA
[6] Veristat Inc, Holliston, MA USA
关键词
smallpox vaccine; vaccinia; myopericarditis;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.079
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Despite the eradication of smallpox as a naturally occurring disease, concern persists over its potential use as a bioterrorist agent. The development of a new-generation smallpox vaccine represents an important contribution to a cogent biodefense strategy. We conducted a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at four sites in the United States to determine whether a clonal smallpox vaccine manufactured in cell culture, ACAM2000, is equivalent to the standard calf-lymph vaccine, Dryvax((R)), in terms of cutaneous response rate, antibody responses and safety. Subjects received either Dryvax((R)) or one of four dose levels of ACAM2000 administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle. All subjects in the highest ACAM2000 dose group and the Dryvax((R)) group experienced a successful vaccination. Dilution doses of ACAM2000 were associated with success rates below the 90% threshold established for efficacy. There were no differences in the proportion of subjects who developed neutralizing antibody: 94% in the highest ACAM2000 dose group (95% CI, 84-99) and 96% in the Dryvax((R)) group (95% CI, 86-100). No significant differences were seen between the effective ACAM2000 and Dryvax((R)) groups regarding the occurrence of adverse events. One subject who received ACAM2000 developed myopericarditis. In healthy, primary vaccines ACAM2000 has a similar vaccination success rate, antibody response, and safety profile to Dryvax. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3301 / 3309
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
*AC INC, 2002, INV BROCH ACAM2000 S
[2]   Myopericarditis following smallpox vaccination [J].
Arness, MK ;
Eckart, RE ;
Love, SS ;
Atwood, JE ;
Wells, TS ;
Engler, RJM ;
Collins, LC ;
Ludwig, SL ;
Riddle, JR ;
Grabenstein, JD ;
Tornberg, DN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 160 (07) :642-651
[3]  
CDC, 2001, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V50, P1
[4]  
*CDCP, 2003, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V52, P639
[5]  
*CDCP, 2003, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V52, P819
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P248
[7]   Smallpox vaccination: Risk considerations for patients with atopic dermatitis [J].
Engler, RJM ;
Kenner, J ;
Leung, DYM .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 110 (03) :357-365
[8]  
Fenner F., 1988, SMALLPOX ITS ERADICA
[9]   Clinical responses to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine [J].
Frey, SE ;
Couch, RB ;
Tacket, CO ;
Treanor, JJ ;
Wolff, M ;
Newman, FK ;
Atmar, RL ;
Edelman, R ;
Nolan, CM ;
Belshe, RB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (17) :1265-1274
[10]   Dose-related effects of smallpox vaccine [J].
Frey, SE ;
Newman, FK ;
Cruz, J ;
Shelton, WB ;
Tennant, JM ;
Polach, T ;
Rothman, AL ;
Kennedy, JS ;
Wolff, M ;
Belshe, RB ;
Ennis, FA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (17) :1275-1280