A relative spatial access assessment approach for analyzing potential spatial access to colorectal cancer services in Texas

被引:138
作者
Wan, Neng [2 ]
Zhan, F. Benjamin [2 ,3 ]
Zou, Bin [1 ]
Chow, Edwin [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Changsha 410086, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Texas State Univ San Marcos, Texas Ctr Geog Informat Sci, Dept Geog, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
Spatial analysis; Colorectal cancer; Cancer disparity; Health; GIS; HEALTH-CARE ACCESS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS; ACCESSIBILITY; SHORTAGE; BREAST; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.05.001
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The usefulness of gravity-based spatial access models is limited because of the uncertainty introduced by the range of values of the impedance coefficient. To solve this problem, this paper proposes the concept of spatial access ratio (SPAR) derived from the enhanced 2-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method - a recent extension of the gravity model - to assess potential spatial access. First, a sensitivity assessment is conducted to verify the effectiveness of SPAR and its advantages in overcoming the uncertainty problem. Then, the E2SFCA method and the shortest travel time method are employed to measure potential spatial access to colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention and treatment services in Texas based on data at the census tract level. The socio-demographic and geographic distributions of potential spatial access to CRC services are also examined. The sensitivity assessment reveals substantial fluctuations in the values of the spatial access index calculated directly by the E2SFCA method under different values of the impedance coefficient. However, the values of SPAR remain stable under different values of the coefficient. A comparative analysis indicates that potential spatial access to primary care physicians (PCPs), CRC screening facilities, and oncologists varied among different racial/ethnic and socioeconomic population groups as well as in different geographic regions in Texas. Non-Hispanic blacks, Asians, and people in affluent areas had a geographical advantage in accessing CRC services than other groups. The urban/rural difference was more obvious and serious than those of different racial/ethnic groups and groups with different socio-economic statuses, as metropolitan residents had more than three times the potential spatial access than isolated rural residents. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Aday L A, 1974, Health Serv Res, V9, P208
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010 UND
[3]  
[Anonymous], CENS 2000 SUMM FIL 1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Cancer Facts Figures 2010
[5]   Geographic access to health care for rural medicare beneficiaries [J].
Chan, L ;
Hart, LG ;
Goodman, DC .
JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2006, 22 (02) :140-146
[6]  
Cockerham W. C., 1998, MED SOC
[7]   SEEKING A BALANCED PHYSICIAN WORKFORCE FOR THE 21ST-CENTURY [J].
COOPER, RA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (09) :680-687
[8]   Social and geographic disparities in access to reference care site for patients with colorectal cancer in France [J].
Dejardin, O ;
Bouvier, AM ;
Herbert, C ;
Velten, M ;
Buemi, A ;
Delafosse, P ;
Maarouf, N ;
Boutreux, S ;
Launoy, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (10) :1842-1845
[9]  
Environmental Systems Research Institute ESRI, 2009, ARCGIS V 9 3
[10]  
Fotheringham AS., 2000, Quantitative geography: Perspectives on spatial data analysis