共 85 条
EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009
被引:400
作者:
Cruccu, G.
[1
,2
]
Sommer, C.
[1
,3
]
Anand, P.
[4
]
Attal, N.
[1
,5
]
Baron, R.
[6
]
Garcia-Larrea, L.
[1
,7
,8
]
Haanpaa, M.
[1
,9
]
Jensen, T. S.
[1
,10
,11
]
Serra, J.
[1
,12
]
Treede, R. -D.
[13
]
机构:
[1] EFNS Panel Neuropath Pain, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Neurol Sci, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Neurol, D-8700 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Clin Neurosci, London, England
[5] Hop Ambroise Pare, APHP, INSERM, Ctr Evaluat & Traitement Douleur,U792, Boulogne, France
[6] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Dept Neurol, Div Neurol Pain Res & Therapy, Kiel, Germany
[7] INSERM, Cent Integrat Pain Unit, U879, F-69008 Lyon, France
[8] Univ Lyon 1, Hop Neurol, F-69365 Lyon, France
[9] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Helsinki, Finland
[10] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Danish Pain Res Ctr, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[11] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[12] MC Mutual, Dept Neurol, Barcelona, Spain
[13] Univ Heidelberg, Med Fac Mannheim, Chair Neurophysiol, D-6800 Mannheim, Germany
关键词:
evoked potentials;
functional neuroimaging;
neuropathic pain;
quantitative sensory testing;
screening tools;
skin biopsy;
INDUCED SECONDARY HYPERALGESIA;
POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;
OPIOID RECEPTOR-BINDING;
BRUSH-EVOKED ALLODYNIA;
SMALL FIBER NEUROPATHY;
CORD-INJURY PAIN;
POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA;
PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY;
TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA;
SKIN BIOPSY;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02969.x
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
100204 [神经病学];
摘要:
Background and purpose: We have revised the previous EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain (NP) assessment, which aimed to provide recommendations for the diagnostic process, screening tools and questionnaires, quantitative sensory testing (QST), microneurography, pain-related reflexes and evoked potentials, functional neuroimaging and skin biopsy. Methods: We have checked and rated the literature published in the period 2004-2009, according to the EFNS method of classification for diagnostic procedures. Results: Most of the previous recommendations were reinforced by the new studies. The main revisions relate to: (i) the new definition of NP and a diagnostic grading system; (ii) several new validated clinical screening tools that identify NP components, and questionnaires which assess the different types of NP; (iii) recent high-quality studies on laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and skin biopsy. Conclusions: History and bedside examination are still fundamental to a correct diagnosis, whilst screening tools and questionnaires are useful in indicating probable NP; QST is also useful for indicating the latter, and to assess provoked pains and treatment response. Amongst laboratory tests, LEPs are the best tool for assessing A delta pathway dysfunction, and skin biopsy for assessing neuropathies with distal loss of unmyelinated nerve fibres.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1018
页数:9
相关论文

