Does the Complications Screening Program flag cases with process of care problems? Using explicit criteria to judge processes

被引:42
作者
Iezzoni, LI
Davis, RB
Palmer, RH
Cahalane, M
Hamel, MB
Mukamal, K
Phillips, RS
Banks, NJ
Davies, DT
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Med,Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Charles A Dana Res Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Harvard Thorndike Lab, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
administrative data; discharge abstracts; hospital complications; processes of care; quality measurement;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/11.2.107
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The Complications Screening Program (CSP) aims to identify 28 potentially preventable complications of hospital care using computerized discharge abstracts, including demographic information, diagnosis and procedure codes. Objective. To validate the CSF as a quality indicator by using explicit process of care criteria to determine whether hospital discharges flagged by the CSP experienced more process problems than unflagged discharges. Methods. The CSP was applied to computerized hospital discharge abstracts from Medicare beneficiaries greater than or equal to 65 years old admitted in 1994 to hospitals in California and Connecticut for major surgery or medical treatment. Of 28 CSP complications, 17 occurred sufficiently frequently to study. Discharges flagged (cases) and unflagged (controls) by the CSP were sampled and photocopied medical records were obtained. Physicians specified detailed, objective, explicit criteria, itemizing 'key steps' in processes of care that could potentially have prevented or caused complications. Trained nurses abstracted medical records using these explicit criteria. Process problem rates between cases and controls were compared. Results. The final sample included 740 surgical and 416 medical discharges. Rates of process problems were high, ranging from 24.4 to 82.5% across CSP screens for surgical cases. Problems were lower for medical cases, ranging from 2.0 to 69.1% across CSP screens. Problem rates were 45.7% for surgical and 5.0% for medical controls. Rates of problems did not differ significantly across flagged and unflagged discharges. Conclusions. The CSP did not flag discharges with significantly higher rates of explicit process problems than unflagged discharges. Various initiatives throughout the USA use techniques similar to the CSP to identify complications of care. Based on these CSP findings, such approaches should be evaluated cautiously.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTION [J].
BATES, DW ;
CULLEN, DJ ;
LAIRD, N ;
PETERSEN, LA ;
SMALL, SD ;
SERVI, D ;
LAFFEL, G ;
SWEITZER, BJ ;
SHEA, BF ;
HALLISEY, R ;
VANDERVLIET, M ;
NEMESKAL, R ;
LEAPE, LL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (01) :29-34
[2]   HOSPITAL LEADERS OPINIONS OF THE HCFA MORTALITY DATA [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
WALD, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (02) :247-249
[3]   THE RATIO OF OBSERVED-TO-EXPECTED MORTALITY AS A QUALITY OF CARE INDICATOR IN NONSURGICAL VA PATIENTS [J].
BEST, WR ;
COWPER, DC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (04) :390-400
[4]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[5]   HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH ADVERSE EVENTS AND SUBSTANDARD CARE [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
HEBERT, LE ;
LAIRD, NM ;
LAWTHERS, A ;
THORPE, KE ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LIPSITZ, SR ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (24) :3265-3269
[6]   RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF JUDGMENTS CONCERNING ADVERSE EVENTS SUFFERED BY HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LOCALIO, RJ ;
LAIRD, NL .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (12) :1148-1158
[7]   QUALITY-OF-CARE ASSESSMENT - CHOOSING A METHOD FOR PEER REVIEW [J].
BROOK, RH ;
APPEL, FA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 288 (25) :1323-1329
[8]   Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly [J].
Chassin, MR ;
Hannan, EL ;
DeBuono, BA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (06) :394-398
[9]   Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: Site visit assessment of process and structure [J].
Daley, J ;
Forbes, MG ;
Young, GJ ;
Charns, MP ;
Gibbs, JO ;
Hur, K ;
Henderson, W ;
Khuri, SF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 185 (04) :341-351
[10]   MEASURING HOSPITAL PERFORMANCE - THE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF RISK-ADJUSTED INDEXES OF MORTALITY, READMISSIONS, AND COMPLICATIONS [J].
DESHARNAIS, SI ;
MCMAHON, LF ;
WROBLEWSKI, RT ;
HOGAN, AJ .
MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (12) :1127-1141