Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality

被引:36
作者
Feeley, TH [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454 USA
关键词
employee turnover; communication networks; organizational commitment; centrality;
D O I
10.1080/00909880009365574
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study tested Feeley and Barnett's (1997) Erosion Model (EM) of employee turnover which predicts that individuals who are more central in their communication network will be more likely to remain at their position (or less likely to turnover). Seventy employees from three different organizations were surveyed about their attitudes toward their jobs and were also asked to indicate (by checklist) which employees they spoke to regularly at work. Turnover data were obtained at 3 and 6 months time after the surveys were completed. Results generally supported the Erosion Model of employee turnover. Those employees with high Degree or number of links in the network were less likely to turnover. Employees who required fewer links to communicate to all others in the network (i.e., Closeness) were also less likely to turnover but this relationship only approached statistical significance (p =.06). Betweenness, defined as the frequency with which a person falls between pairs of other positions in a network, was also significantly related to employee turnover. It was also predicted, based on Feeley and Barnett's EM, that the relationship between network position and turnover would be mediated by an employee's level of commitment to the organization and his or her intentions to leave work. Closeness significantly predicted commitment while Betweenness and Degree were unrelated to commitment levels. Organizational commitment was negatively related to intentions to leave work and, unexpectedly, commitment levels were positively related to employee turnover. The results were discussed and the applications of this research for management practitioners were considered.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 277
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UCINET 4 VERSION 1 0
[2]   The social fabric of a team-based MBA Program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance [J].
Baldwin, TT ;
Bedell, MD ;
Johnson, JL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (06) :1369-1397
[3]  
BAVELAS A, 1950, J ACOUST SOC AM, V22, P272
[4]   Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective [J].
Brass, DJ ;
Butterfield, KD ;
Skaggs, BC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (01) :14-31
[5]   CHANGING PATTERNS OR PATTERNS OF CHANGE - THE EFFECTS OF A CHANGE IN TECHNOLOGY ON SOCIAL NETWORK STRUCTURE AND POWER [J].
BURKHARDT, ME ;
BRASS, DJ .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :104-127
[6]   MEANING AND MEASUREMENT OF TURNOVER - COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE MEASURES AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESEARCH [J].
CAMPION, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (02) :199-212
[7]  
COHEN A, 1993, ACAD MANAGE J, V36, P1140, DOI 10.5465/256650
[8]   ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT-TURNOVER RELATIONSHIP ACROSS OCCUPATIONAL GROUPS - A METAANALYSIS [J].
COHEN, A ;
HUDECEK, N .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 1993, 18 (02) :188-213
[9]  
Cranny C.J., 1992, JOB SATISFACTION PEO
[10]   FUNCTIONAL TURNOVER - AN EMPIRICAL-ASSESSMENT [J].
DALTON, DR ;
KRACKHARDT, DM ;
PORTER, LW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (06) :716-721