Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for diabetic foot infections (SIDESTEP): prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded, multicentre trial

被引:192
作者
Lipsky, BA
Armstrong, DG
Citron, DM
Tice, AD
Morgenstern, DE
Abramson, MA
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[3] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, Scholl Coll Podiatr Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, Ctr Lower Extrem Ambulatory Res, Chicago, IL USA
[5] RM Alden Res Lab, Santa Monica, CA USA
[6] Univ Hawaii, John A Burns Sch Med, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[7] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67694-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Diabetic foot infections are a common and serious problem, yet few randomised trials of adequate quality have compared the efficacy of the various antibiotic regimens available for their treatment. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for foot infections. Methods We did a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre trial in adults (n=586) with diabetes and a foot infection classified as moderate-to-severe and requiring intravenous antibiotics. We assigned patients intravenous ertapenem (1 g daily; n=295) or piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h; n=291) given for a minimum of 5 days, after which oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (875/125 mg every 12 h) could be given for up to 23 days. Investigators retained the option to administer vancomycin to patients in either group to ensure adequate coverage for potentially antibiotic resistant Enterococcus spp and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Our primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a favourable clinical response (cure or improvement) on the day that intravenous antibiotic was discontinued. Analyses were by an evaluable-patient only approach. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00229112. Findings Of the 576 patients treated, 445 were available for assessment at the end of intravenous therapy. Both baseline characteristics and favourable clinical response rates were similar for the 226 who received ertapenem and the 219 who received piperacillin/tazobactam. (94% vs 92%, respectively; between treatment difference 1.9%, 95% CI -2.9 to 6.9). Rates of favourable microbiological responses (eradication rates and clinical outcomes, by pathogen) and adverse events did not differ between groups. Interpretation Clinical and microbiological outcomes for patients treated with ertapenem were equivalent to those for patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, suggesting that this once-daily antibiotic should be considered for parenteral. therapy of diabetic foot infections, when deemed appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1703
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections [J].
Abdulrazak, A ;
Bitar, ZI ;
Al-Shamali, AA ;
Mobasher, LA .
JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS, 2005, 19 (03) :138-141
[2]  
Apelqvist J, 2000, DIABETES-METAB RES, V16, pS75, DOI 10.1002/1520-7560(200009/10)16:1+<::AID-DMRR139>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-8
[4]   Validation of a diabetic wound classification system - The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA ;
Harkless, LB .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (05) :855-859
[5]  
ARMSTRONG DG, 1996, J FOOT ANKLE SURG, V35, P528, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1067-2516(96)80125-6
[6]   Neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers [J].
Boulton, AJM ;
Kirsner, RS ;
Vileikyte, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (01) :48-55
[7]  
Caputo GM, 1997, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V56, P195
[8]  
Carvalho Cibele B.M., 2004, Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab, V48, P398
[9]  
Cunha B A, 2000, J Foot Ankle Surg, V39, P253
[10]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the diabetic foot clinic:: a worsening problem [J].
Dang, CN ;
Prasad, YDM ;
Boulton, AJM ;
Jude, EB .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (02) :159-161