The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system

被引:186
作者
Krabbe, PFM
Stouthard, MEA
Essink-Bot, ML
Bonsel, GJ
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Inst Social Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
multiattribute health-status classification systems; cognitive dimension; validity; reliability; methodology; EuroQol;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00163-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A methodological study was conducted to examine the effect of extending a frequently used simple multiattribute health-status classification system by adding a cognitive dimension. The EQ-5D questionnaire is a generic instrument to value health, developed by the EuroQol Group. The EQ-5D defines health according to five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. We defined 18 different hearth states according to the standard EQ-5D classification. A second set of health states was constructed similar to the first, except for the addition of a cognitive dimension (EQ-5D+C). Valuations of both sets of health states were statistically analyzed to detect the effect of the additional dimension. The cognitive dimension generated systematically different values compared with the standard EQ-5D version, whereas the content validity improved. Both systems evoked equally reliable values. Analyses showed that a simple additive model to predict summary Values for health states was not optimal for both systems. Although there is a current lack of consensus regarding the domains that are selected to represent health status, this study has shown the importance of considering the inclusion of a cognitive domain. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 301
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ABDALLA M, 1995, C P EUR PLEN M 1994, P75
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, GLOBAL BURDEN DIS
[3]  
BONSEL GJ, 1995, C P EUR PLEN M 1994, P115
[4]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[5]   Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states [J].
Dolan, P .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (11) :1095-1108
[6]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[7]  
Essink-Bot M L, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P237, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020307
[8]   An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures - The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument [J].
EssinkBot, ML ;
Krabbe, PFM ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Aaronson, NK .
MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (05) :522-537
[9]   A COMPREHENSIVE MULTIATTRIBUTE SYSTEM FOR CLASSIFYING THE HEALTH-STATUS OF SURVIVORS OF CHILDHOOD-CANCER [J].
FEENY, D ;
FURLONG, W ;
BARR, RD ;
TORRANCE, GW ;
ROSENBAUM, P ;
WEITZMAN, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (06) :923-928
[10]  
FEENY D, 1994, CHEPA WORKING PAPERS, V945