Nicotine induces a long QT phenotype in Kcnq1-deficient mouse hearts

被引:20
作者
Tosaka, T
Casimiro, MC
Rong, Q
Tella, S
Oh, M
Katchman, AN
Pezzullo, JC
Pfeifer, K
Ebert, SN
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] NICHHD, Lab Mammalian Genes & Dev, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Drug Enforcement Adm, Drug & Chem Evaluat Sect, Off Divers Control, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1124/jpet.103.053017
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We have previously shown that targeted disruption of the mouse Kcnq1 gene produces a long QT phenotype in vivo that requires extracardiac factors for manifestation (Casimiro et al., 2001). In the present study, we explore the hypothesis that autonomic neuroeffector transmission represents the "extracardiac" stimulus that induces a long QT phenotype in mouse hearts lacking Kcnq1. Using the isolated perfused (Langendorff) mouse heart preparation, we challenged wild-type (Kcnq1(+/+)) and mutant (Kcnq1(-/-)) mouse hearts with nicotine, an autonomic stimulant. ECGs were recorded continuously, and QT intervals were compared at baseline and peak nicotine-induced heart rates. No significant differences in QT or any other ECG parameters were observed in Kcnq1(+/+) versus Kcnq1(-/-) hearts at baseline. In the presence of nicotine, however, the JT, QT, and rate-corrected QT (QTc) intervals were significantly prolonged in Kcnq1(-/-) hearts relative to Kcnq1(+/+) hearts (e.g., QTc = 92 +/- 11 ms versus 66 +/- 2 ms, respectively, p < 0.01). Similar findings were obtained when the hearts were challenged with either epinephrine or isoproterenol (0.1 μM each), thereby suggesting that sympathetic stimulation drives the long QT phenotype in Kcnq1-deficient hearts. This idea is supported by in vivo ECG data obtained from unrestrained conscious mice using radiotelemetry recording techniques. Again, no significant ECG differences were observed in Kcnq1(-/-) versus Kcnq1(+/+) mice at baseline, but handling/injection stress led to significant QTc increases in Kcnq1(-/-) mice relative to wild-type controls (11 +/- 3 versus -1 +/- 1%, respectively, p < 0.05). These data suggest that sympathetic stimulation induces a long QT phenotype in Kcnq1-deficient mouse hearts.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 987
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Do all voltage-gated potassium channels use MiRPs? [J].
Abbott, GW ;
Goldstein, SAN ;
Sesti, F .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2001, 88 (10) :981-983
[2]   Swimming, a gene-specific arrhythmogenic trigger for inherited long QT syndrome [J].
Ackerman, MJ ;
Tester, DJ ;
Porter, CJ .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 74 (11) :1088-1094
[3]   KCNE5 induces time- and voltage-dependent modulation of the KCNQ1 current [J].
Angelo, K ;
Jespersen, T ;
Grunnet, M ;
Nielsen, MS ;
Klaerke, DA ;
Olesen, SP .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 83 (04) :1997-2006
[4]   K(v)LQT1 and IsK (minK) proteins associate to form the I-Ks cardiac potassium current [J].
Barhanin, J ;
Lesage, F ;
Guillemare, E ;
Fink, M ;
Lazdunski, M ;
Romey, G .
NATURE, 1996, 384 (6604) :78-80
[5]  
BURN J, 1958, BRIT MED J, V2, P137
[6]   Congenital and acquired long QT syndrome [J].
Camm, AJ ;
Janse, MJ ;
Roden, DM ;
Rosen, MR ;
Cinca, J ;
Cobbe, SM .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (15) :1232-1237
[7]   Targeted disruption of the Kcnq1 gene produces a mouse model of Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome [J].
Casimiro, MC ;
Knollmann, BC ;
Ebert, SN ;
Vary, JC ;
Greene, AE ;
Franz, MR ;
Grinberg, A ;
Huang, SP ;
Pfeifer, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (05) :2526-2531
[8]   The Long QT Syndromes: Genetic basis and clinical implications [J].
Chiang, CE ;
Roden, DM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (01) :1-12
[9]   Gender differences in the long QT syndrome:: effects of β-adrenoceptor blockade [J].
Conrath, CE ;
Wilde, AAM ;
Jongbloed, RJE ;
Alders, M ;
van Langen, IM ;
van Tintelen, JP ;
Doevendans, PA ;
Opthof, T .
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2002, 53 (03) :770-776
[10]   Nicotinic mechanisms in the autonomic control of organ systems [J].
De Biasi, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROBIOLOGY, 2002, 53 (04) :568-579