Validation of the stanford 7-Day Recall to assess habitual physical activity

被引:158
作者
Richardson, MT
Ainsworth, BE
Jacobs, DR
Leon, AS
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Coll Educ, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Exercise Sci, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ S Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Coll Educ & Human Dev, Sch Kinesiol & Leisure Studies, Div Kinesiol,Lab Physiol Hyg & Exercise Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
accelerometer; exercise; exertion; physical activity assessment; questionnaire; validity;
D O I
10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00190-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: The ability of the Stanford 7 Day Recall (7 DR), a well known instrument for surveying work and leisure-time physical activity (PA) in epidemiologic studies, to assess levels of habitual PA in men and women was evaluated. METHODS: The 7 DR was administered twice, one month apart. Its accuracy was studied in 77 men and women, aged 20-59 years, by its repeatability and comparison of both administrations of the 7 DR with: fourteen 48-hour physical activity records; fourteen 48 hour Caltrac accelerometer readings; peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) determinations; and percent body fat. These criteria measures were obtained over a year's duration. RESULTS: One month repeatability correlation coefficients for 7-DR total activity were r = 0.60 (p less than or equal to 0.01) and r = 0.36 (p less than or equal to 0.05) for men and women, respectively. Comparison of corresponding indices of activity between the 7-DR and the PA record indicated: 1) a closer relationship in men for total (r = 0.58 for visit 10 7-DR and 0.66 for visit 11 7-DR, p less than or equal to 0.01), and very hard (r = 0.44 and 0.60, p less than or equal to 0.05) activity then in women (r = 0.32 and 0.33, P less than or equal to 0.05, and r = 0.21, ns and 0.43, p less than or equal to 0.01, respectively); and 2) in general, lower and less consistent associations for hard, moderate, and light activity. Total PA by the 7-DR was significantly associated with Caltrac readings (r = 0.54 and 0.45) in men only. 7-DR results were more consistently related to VO2 peak in men than women, but were significantly related to percent body fat in women only. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the 7-DR to assess habitual PA was greater for more vigorous than for lower intensity PA. Ann Epidemiol 2001;11:145-153. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 153
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF SELF-REPORTED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY STATUS - THE LIPID-RESEARCH-CLINICS QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
JACOBS, DR ;
LEON, AS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1993, 25 (01) :92-98
[2]   ACCURACY OF THE COLLEGE ALUMNUS PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
LEON, AS ;
RICHARDSON, MT ;
JACOBS, DR ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 46 (12) :1403-1411
[3]   COMPENDIUM OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES - CLASSIFICATION OF ENERGY COSTS OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
HASKELL, WL ;
LEON, AS ;
JACOBS, DR ;
MONTOYE, HJ ;
SALLIS, JF ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1993, 25 (01) :71-80
[4]  
AINSWORTH BE, 1993, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V35, P1017
[5]  
Ainsworth BE., 1993, WOMEN SPORT PHYS ACT, V2, P1, DOI [10.1123/wspaj.2.1.1, DOI 10.1123/WSPAJ.2.1.1]
[6]  
Albanes D, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P65, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00014
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF HABITUAL PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY BY A 7-DAY RECALL IN A COMMUNITY SURVEY AND CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTS [J].
BLAIR, SN ;
HASKELL, WL ;
HO, P ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS ;
VRANIZAN, KM ;
FARQUHAR, JW ;
WOOD, PD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 122 (05) :794-804
[9]  
BOUCHARD C, 1994, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FI
[10]   Determinants of physical activity among female adolescents [J].
Bungum, TJ ;
Vincent, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 13 (02) :115-122