Comparison of azimuthal seismic anisotropy from surface waves and finite strain from global mantle-circulation models

被引:129
作者
Becker, TW
Kellogg, JB
Ekström, G
O'Connell, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Cecil H & Ida Green Inst Geophys & Planetary Phys, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
finite strain; intraplate deformation; mantle convection; plate driving forces; seismic anisotropy;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02085.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We present global models of strain accumulation in mantle flow to compare the predicted finite-strain ellipsoid (FSE) orientations with observed seismic anisotropy. The geographic focus is on oceanic and young continental regions where we expect our models to agree best with azimuthal anisotropy from surface waves. Finite-strain-derived models and alignment with the largest FSE axes lead to better model fits than the hypothesis of alignment of fast propagation orientation with absolute plate motions. Our modelling approach is simplified in that we are using a linear viscosity for flow and assume a simple relationship between strain and anisotropy. However, results are encouraging and suggest that similar models can be used to assess the validity of assumptions inherent in the modelling of mantle convection and lithospheric deformation. Our results substantiate the hypothesis that seismic anisotropy can be used as an indicator for mantle flow; circulation-derived models can contribute to the establishment of a quantitative functional relationship between the two.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 714
页数:19
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Agee CB, 1998, REV MINERAL, V37, P165
[2]   UPPER MANTLE ANISOTROPY - EVIDENCE FROM FREE OSCILLATIONS [J].
ANDERSON, DL ;
DZIEWONSKI, AM .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 69 (02) :383-404
[3]   A comparison of tomographic and geodynamic mantle models [J].
Becker, TW ;
Boschi, L .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2002, 3 :1-48
[4]   Predicting plate velocities with mantle circulation models [J].
Becker, TW ;
O'Connell, RJ .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2001, 2
[5]  
BECKER TW, 2001, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V82
[6]  
BECKER TW, 2002, THESIS HARVARD U CAM
[7]  
Ben Ismail W, 1998, TECTONOPHYSICS, V296, P145
[8]   Seismic anisotropy in the upper mantle 2. Predictions for current plate boundary flow models [J].
Blackman, DK ;
Kendall, JM .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2002, 3
[9]   Seismic anisotropy of the upper mantle 1. Factors that affect mineral texture and effective elastic properties [J].
Blackman, DK ;
Wenk, HR ;
Kendall, JM .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2002, 3
[10]   New images of the Earth's upper mantle from measurements of surface wave phase velocity anomalies -: art. no. 2059 [J].
Boschi, L ;
Ekström, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2002, 107 (B4)