Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers

被引:21
作者
Liss, David T. [1 ,2 ]
French, Dustin D. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Buchanan, David R. [6 ]
Brown, Tiffany [1 ,2 ]
Magner, Bridget G. [6 ]
Kollar, Stephanie [6 ]
Baker, David W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Adv Equ Clin Prevent Serv, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Healthcare Studies, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Vet Affairs Hlth Serv Res & Dev Serv, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Erie Family Hlth Ctr, Chicago, IL USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
FECAL-OCCULT-BLOOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; MULTIFACETED INTERVENTION; IMPROVE ADHERENCE; UNITED-STATES; TESTS; RATES; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
Introduction: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies. Methods: Five screening and cost outcomes were simulated over 1 year at a "base case" community health center serving 1000 screening-eligible patients: (1) FIT completion among patients due for screening; (2) proportion up-to-date on screening; (3) cost per patient due for screening; (4) cost per completed FIT; and (5) total organizational cost. Uncertainty analysis investigated potential savings from optimizing staff workflows during FIT outreach. Data were collected in 2012-2014, with analysis conducted 2014-2015. Results: Using POC strategies, 24.0% of patients due for screening completed FIT, versus 42.4% under outreach (18.4% absolute difference). When calculations included patients up-to-date on screening from prior colonoscopy, 41.7% were up-to-date via POC, versus 55.8% for outreach (14.1% absolute difference). POC cost $4.93 per patient, versus $30.43 for outreach ($25.50 difference). Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Total organizational cost was $3,779 for POC distribution and $23,315 for outreach ($19,536 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows. Conclusions: Outreach is an effective, practical, relatively low-cost strategy; costs could be reduced further by optimizing staff workflows. Despite its value, outreach costs more than POC distribution and may be difficult for community health centers to implement under current payment models. (C) 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:E54 / E61
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2012, PRIM CAR PUBL HLTH E
[2]
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[3]
Comparative Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Adherence to Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Baker, David W. ;
Brown, Tiffany ;
Buchanan, David R. ;
Weil, Jordan ;
Balsley, Kate ;
Ranalli, Lauren ;
Lee, Ji Young ;
Cameron, Kenzie A. ;
Ferreira, M. Rosario ;
Stephens, Quinn ;
Goldman, Shira N. ;
Rademaker, Alred ;
Wolf, Michael S. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (08) :1235-1241
[4]
Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in a community health center [J].
Baker, David W. ;
Brown, Tiffany ;
Buchanan, David R. ;
Weil, Jordan ;
Cameron, Kenzie A. ;
Ranalli, Lauren ;
Ferreira, M. Rosario ;
Stephens, Quinn ;
Balsley, Kate ;
Goldman, Shira N. ;
Wolf, Michael S. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
[5]
Expanding the Roles of Medical Assistants Who Does What in Primary Care? [J].
Bodenheimer, Thomas ;
Willard-Grace, Rachel ;
Ghorob, Amireh .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (07) :1025-1026
[6]
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Petitti, Diana B. ;
DeWitt, Thomas G. ;
Dietrich, Allen J. ;
Gregory, Kimberly D. ;
Harris, Russell ;
Isham, George ;
LeFevre, Michael L. ;
Leipzig, Roseanne M. ;
Loveland-Cherry, Carol ;
Marion, Lucy N. ;
Melnyk, Bernadette ;
Moyer, Virginia A. ;
Ockene, Judith K. ;
Sawaya, George F. ;
Yawn, Barbara P. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (09) :627-+
[7]
A randomized trial of direct mailing of fecal occult blood tests to increase colorectal cancer screening [J].
Church, TR ;
Yeazel, MW ;
Jones, RM ;
Kochevar, LK ;
Watt, GD ;
Mongin, SJ ;
Cordes, JE ;
Engelhard, D .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (10) :770-780
[8]
Comparative Effectiveness of Multifaceted Outreach to Initiate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Goldman, Shira N. ;
Liss, David T. ;
Brown, Tiffany ;
Lee, Ji Young ;
Buchanan, David R. ;
Balsley, Kate ;
Cesan, Ana ;
Weil, Jordan ;
Garrity, Bridget H. ;
Baker, David W. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (08) :1178-1184
[9]
An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening A Randomized Trial [J].
Green, Beverly B. ;
Wang, Ching-Yun ;
Anderson, Melissa L. ;
Chubak, Jessica ;
Meenan, Richard T. ;
Vernon, Sally W. ;
Fuller, Sharon .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 158 (05) :301-311
[10]
Health Resources and Services Administration, 2012, 2012 HLTH CTR DAT