Biological control of rice bacterial blight by Lysobacter antibioticus strain 13-1

被引:96
作者
Ji, Guang-Hai [1 ]
Wei, Lan-Fang [2 ]
He, Yue-Qiu [1 ]
Wu, Ya-Peng [1 ]
Bai, Xue-Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Agr Univ, Key Lab Agr Biodivers Plant Dis Management, Minist Educ, Kunming 650201, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Agr Univ, Fac Resource & Environm, Kunming 650201, Peoples R China
关键词
Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae; rice bacterial blight; Lysobacter antibioticus; biocontrol;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.004
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bacterial leaf blight (BB) is a worldwide destructive rice disease caused by pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). A novel strain of Lysobacter antibioticus, which was isolated from the rhizosphere of rice in Yunnan Province of China, can significantly inhibit the growth of various phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi, especially BB pathogen Xoo. In greenhouse experiments, whole bacterial broth culture (WBC) of strain 13-1 was more effective in reducing BB than other components of the culture, with disease suppression efficiency up to 69.7%. However, bacterial cells re-suspended in water, cell-free culture extracts, and heated cultures also significantly reduced 1313 severity. Suppression efficiencies ranged from 79.0% to 61.8% for undiluted to 100-fold dilution treatments and from 57.6% to 31.7% when the WBC of strain 13-1 (108 CFU/mL) was applied at 3 days and 7 days prior to pathogen inoculation, respectively. In three field trials, strain 13-1 reduced 1313 incidence by 73.5%, 78.3%, and 59.1%, respectively. Disease suppression by strain 13-1 varied significantly among different rice cultivars, although efficacy was not directly related to the susceptibility level of the cultivars. Efficacy of biocontrol was also affected by different pathogen isolates, with some isolates of Xoo being more sensitive to 13-1 suppression than others. These results suggest that antibiotics and density of colonization on leaves may be involved for biological control of rice BB by strain 13-1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of L. antibioticus being a potential biocontrol agent for rice bacterial blight. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 296
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF BACTERIA INTRODUCED INTO SOIL [J].
ACEA, MJ ;
MOORE, CR ;
ALEXANDER, M .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 20 (04) :509-515
[2]   LYSOBACTER, A NEW GENUS OF NON-FRUITING, GLIDING BACTERIA WITH A HIGH BASE RATIO [J].
CHRISTENSEN, P ;
COOK, FD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1978, 28 (03) :367-393
[3]  
DUNNY GM, 1988, CELL CELLS SIGNALING, P367
[4]  
Fang Z.D., 1998, METHODS PLANT PATHOL
[5]   Production of antifungal compounds by Lysobacter enzymogenes isolate 3.1T8 under different conditions in relation to its efficacy as a biocontrol agent of Pythium aphanidermatum in cucumber [J].
Folman, LB ;
De Klein, MJEM ;
Postma, J ;
van Veen, JA .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2004, 31 (02) :145-154
[6]   Characterisation of Lysobacter enzymogenes (Christensen and Cook 1978) strain 3.1T8, a powerful antagonist of fungal diseases of cucumber [J].
Folman, LB ;
Postma, J ;
van Veen, JA .
MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 158 (02) :107-115
[7]   Evaluation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain C3 for biocontrol of brown patch disease [J].
Giesler, LJ ;
Yuen, GY .
CROP PROTECTION, 1998, 17 (06) :509-513
[8]  
Gnanamanickam SS, 1999, CURR SCI INDIA, V77, P1435
[9]   Characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting bacteria strain Delftia tsuruhatensis HR4 both as a diazotroph and a potential biocontrol agent against various plant pathogens [J].
Han, JG ;
Sun, L ;
Dong, XZ ;
Cai, ZQ ;
Sun, XL ;
Yang, HL ;
Wang, YS ;
Song, W .
SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (01) :66-76
[10]   Suppression of damping-off disease in host plants by the rhizoplane bacterium Lysobacter sp strain SB-K88 is linked to plant colonization and antibiosis against soilborne peronosporomycetes [J].
Islam, MT ;
Hashidoko, Y ;
Deora, A ;
Ito, T ;
Tahara, S .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (07) :3786-3796