Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy in bone and soft tissue sarcomas

被引:213
作者
Kamada, T
Tsujii, H
Tsuji, H
Yanagi, T
Mizoe, J
Miyamoto, T
Kato, H
Yamada, S
Morita, S
Yoshikawa, K
Kandatsu, S
Tateishi, A
机构
[1] Natl Inst Radiol Sci, Res Ctr Hosp Charged Particle Therapy, Inage Ku, Chiba 261, Japan
[2] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Chiba, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2002.10.050
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the tolerance for and effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with unresectable bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Patients and Methods: We conducted a phase I/II dose escalation study of carbon ion radiotherapy. Fifty-seven patients with 64 sites of bone and soft tissue sarcomas not suited for resection received carbon ion radiotherapy. Tumors involved the spine or paraspinous soft tissues in 19 patients, pelvis in 32 patients, and extremities in six patients. The total dose ranged from 52.8 to 73.6 gray equivalent (GyE) and was administered in 16 fixed fractions over 4 weeks (3.3 to 4.6 GyE/fraction). The median tumor size was 559 cm(3) (range, 20 to 2,290 cm(3)). The minimum follow-up was 18 months. Results: Seven of 17 patients treated with the highest total dose of 73.6 GyE experienced Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 acute skin reactions. Dose escalation was then halted at this level. No other severe acute reactions (grade > 3) were observed in this series. The overall local control rates were 88% and 73% at 1 year and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. The median survival time was 31 months (range, 2 to 60 months), and the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 82% and 46%, respectively. Conclusion: Carbon ion radiotherapy seems to be a safe and effective modality in the management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas not eligible for surgical resection, providing good local control and offering a survival advantage without unacceptable morbidity. (C) 2002 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:4466 / 4471
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, RADIOTHER ONCOL, V35, P17
[2]  
BLAKELY EA, 1984, ADV RADIAT BIOL, V11, P295
[3]  
BRADY LW, 1997, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P2025
[4]   TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) [J].
COX, JD ;
STETZ, J ;
PAJAK, TF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1341-1346
[5]  
Duffaud F, 2000, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V88, P324, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<324::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-E
[7]  
Endo M, 1996, J JASTRO, V8, P231, DOI [10.11182/jastro1989.8.231, DOI 10.11182/JASTRO1989.8.231]
[8]   Osteosarcoma of the pelvis [J].
Grimer, RJ ;
Carter, SR ;
Tillman, RM ;
Spooner, D ;
Mangham, DC ;
Kabukcuoglu, Y .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (05) :796-802
[9]  
Hall EJ, 1988, RADIOBIOLOGY RADIOLO, P281
[10]   LOCALLY CHALLENGING OSTEOGENIC AND CHONDROGENIC TUMORS OF THE AXIAL SKELETON - RESULTS OF COMBINED PROTON AND PHOTON RADIATION-THERAPY USING 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING [J].
HUG, EB ;
FITZEK, MM ;
LIEBSCH, NJ ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (03) :467-476