The economic impact of foot and mouth disease control and eradication in the Philippines

被引:34
作者
Randolph, TF
Perry, BD
Benigno, CC
Santos, IJ
Agbayani, AL
Coleman, P
Webb, R
Gleeson, LJ
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Bur Anim Ind, Natl FMD Task Force, Quezon City, Philippines
[3] Phil Canada LGSP, Cagayan De Oro, Philippines
[4] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1E 7HT, England
[5] CSIRO, Livestock Ind, Australian Anim Hlth Lab, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
来源
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE DE L OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES | 2002年 / 21卷 / 03期
关键词
animal health; cost-benefit analysis; disease control; economic impact assessment; economics; eradication; foot and mouth disease; policy analysis; South-East Asia; The Philippines;
D O I
10.20506/rst.21.3.1355
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The authors evaluate the impact of foot and mouth disease (FMD) and control of the disease in the Philippines using cost-benefit analysis. A scenario in which FMD control is maintained at recent levels with continued presence of the disease is compared to scenarios in which a publicly funded programme achieves eradication by 2005 (current policy objective), 2007 and 2010. Under varying assumptions regarding the development of exports of livestock products following eradication, estimated benefit-cost ratios for the investment in eradication range from 1.6 (2010, no exports) to 12.0 (2005, export of 5,000 tonnes each of low-value and high-value livestock products annually), indicating eradication to be an economically viable investment. The commercial swine sector is estimated to capture 84% of the benefits generated by the public investment in eradication, versus 4% by backyard swine producers. The implications of these results within the context of regional efforts to control FMD in South-East Asia are explored.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 661
页数:17
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
ARAMBULO P, 1977, THESIS U TEXAS
[2]  
Delgado C, 2001, INT TRADE LIVESTOCK, P1, DOI [10.22004/ag.econ.14560, DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.14560]
[3]  
DELGADO CL, 1999, 228 IFPRI FAO ILRI U
[4]   AN EVALUATION OF ALTERNATE CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE IN AUSTRALIA - A REGIONAL APPROACH [J].
GARNER, MG ;
LACK, MB .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (1-2) :9-32
[5]  
HARRISON SR, 1999, EC IMPACT FOOT MOUTH
[6]   Measuring the costs of African animal trypanosomosis, the potential benefits of control and returns to research [J].
Kristjanson, PM ;
Swallow, BM ;
Rowlands, GJ ;
Kruska, RL ;
de Leeuw, PN .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1999, 59 (01) :79-98
[7]   The economic implications of greater global trade in livestock and livestock products [J].
Leslie, J ;
Upton, M .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 1999, 18 (02) :440-457
[8]  
*OFF INT EP, 2002, 8 M OIE SUBC FMD SE
[9]  
*OFF INT EP, 2001, RES 17 REC FOOT MOUT
[10]  
*PAL CORP, 1997, GUID US RISK RISK AN