Termination of a randomized controlled trial of two vasectomy techniques

被引:17
作者
Chen-Mok, M
Bangdiwala, SI
Dominik, R
Hays, M
Irsula, B
Sokal, DC
机构
[1] Family Hlth Int, Durham, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
来源
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS | 2003年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
vasectomy; interim analysis; data monitoring committee; semen analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00267-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Family Health International (FHI) and EngenderHealth conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate a fascial interposition (FI) component of a vas occlusion procedure for male sterilization. A data monitoring committee (DMC) was established to provide independent review of the interim report. The DMC met to review the interim report after enrollment of 552 men. As planned, an estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) for successful vasectomy for the FI group versus the no-FI group controlling for age of the participant and level of experience of the surgeon was obtained for the interim report using Cox's proportional hazards regression. The main analysis comparing time to vasectomy success, defined as two consecutive azoospermic semen samples, was highly significant and met the prespecified level for stopping enrollment (HR= 1.54, p<0.01). However, a troublesome age by vasectomy technique interaction became apparent in the analysis. FI was clearly beneficial for younger males. However, the trend for older men was not as clear. The DMC recommended continuing the trial to better study this interaction and obtain more data to clarify the effect of FI for older men. After consulting further with the DMC, the study statisticians presented the interim report to senior management at FHI. A meeting between FHI senior management and the DMC followed. After much deliberation, trial enrollment was terminated. Follow-up of participants already enrolled in the study continued as planned. This paper presents the issues involved in the decision to terminate the study. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 84
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Data monitoring committees in clinical trials: A practical perspective
[2]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[3]   Independent data monitoring committees: rationale, operations and controversies [J].
Ellenberg, SS .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (17-18) :2573-2583
[4]  
*FDA, 2001, GUID CLIN TRIAL SPON
[5]   THE CASE AGAINST INDEPENDENT MONITORING COMMITTEES [J].
HARRINGTON, D ;
CROWLEY, J ;
GEORGE, SL ;
PAJAK, T ;
REDMOND, C ;
WIEAND, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (13-14) :1411-1414
[6]   THE NO-SCALPEL VASECTOMY [J].
LI, SQ ;
GOLDSTEIN, M ;
ZHU, J ;
HUBER, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (02) :341-344
[7]   Clinical trials and treatment effects monitoring [J].
Meinert, CL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1998, 19 (06) :515-522
[8]   COMPLICATIONS OF VASECTOMY - REVIEW OF 16,000 PATIENTS [J].
PHILP, T ;
GUILLEBAUD, J ;
BUDD, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 56 (06) :745-748
[9]  
Piantadosi S., 1997, Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective, P230
[10]   FACTORS DETERMINING RATE OF DISAPPEARANCE OF SPERM FROM EJACULATE AFTER VASECTOMY [J].
SPENCER, B ;
CHARLESWORTH, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 63 (06) :477-478