Location, location, location: The 3L Approach to house price determination

被引:85
作者
Kiel, Katherine A. [2 ]
Zabel, Jeffrey E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Econ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Coll Holy Cross, Dept Econ, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
关键词
hedonic house price models; location and neighborhood;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhe.2007.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The immobility of houses means that their location affects their values. This explains the common belief that three things determine the price of a house: location, location, and location. We use this notion to develop the 3L Approach to house price determination. That is, prices are determined by the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), town, and street where the house is located. This study creates a unique data set based oil data from the American Housing Survey (AHS) consisting of small 'clusters' of housing units with information on structure and resident characteristics that is merged with census tract-level attributes. We use these data to test the 3L Approach: we find that all three levels of location are significant when estimating the house price hedonic equation. This indicates that the concept of "neighborhood" is multifaceted; individuals care about their very local surroundings such as the general upkeep of their street and possibly their neighbors' characteristics (cluster variables), and a broader area such as the school district and/or the town that accounts for school quality and crime rates (tract variables). We show that price indices and evidence of discrimination and prejudice in the housing market are affected if all three levels of location are not included in the house price hedonic model. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 190
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Defining neighborhood boundaries: Are census tracts obsolete? [J].
Clapp, JM ;
Wang, YZ .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (02) :259-284
[2]   DO HOUSE PRICE INDEXES BASED ON TRANSACTING UNITS REPRESENT THE ENTIRE STOCK - EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY [J].
DIPASQUALE, D ;
SOMERVILLE, CT .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 1995, 4 (03) :195-229
[3]   Commutes, neighborhood effects, and earnings: An analysis of racial discrimination and compensating differentials [J].
Gabriel, SA ;
Rosenthal, SS .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1996, 40 (01) :61-83
[4]  
GABRIEL SA, 1996, LOCATION EFFECT DEMO
[5]   WHAT IS NEIGHBORHOOD - AN EXTERNALITY-SPACE APPROACH [J].
GALSTER, GC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 10 (02) :243-263
[6]   COMPARISON OF BLOCK GROUP AND CENSUS TRACT DATA IN A HEDONIC HOUSING PRICE MODEL [J].
GOODMAN, AC .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1977, 53 (04) :483-487
[7]  
Goodman J., 1992, J. Hous. Econ., V2, P339, DOI DOI 10.1016/1051-1377(92)90008-E
[8]   THE STRUCTURE OF LOCAL PUBLIC-FINANCE AND THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
GYOURKO, J ;
TRACY, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (04) :774-806
[9]   Neighbors' income distribution: economic segregation and mixing in US urban neighborhoods [J].
Hardman, A ;
Ioannides, YM .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (04) :368-382
[10]   Household location and Tiebout: Do families sort according to preferences for locational amenities? [J].
Hoyt, WH ;
Rosenthal, SS .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1997, 42 (02) :159-178