Unsupervised analysis of fMRI data using kernel canonical correlation

被引:91
作者
Hardoon, David R. [1 ]
Mourao-Miranda, Janaina
Brammer, Michael
Shawe-Taylor, John
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, Ctr Computat Stat & Machine Learning, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Inst Psychiat, Ctr Neuroimaging Sci PO 89, Brain Image Anal Unit, London SE5 8AF, England
关键词
machine learning methods; kernel canonical correlation analysis; support vector machines; classifiers; functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.017
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
We introduce a new unsupervised fMRI analysis method based on kernel canonical correlation analysis which differs from the class of supervised learning methods (e.g., the support vector machine) that are increasingly being employed in fMRI data analysis. Whereas SVM associates properties of the imaging data with simple specific categorical labels (e.g., -1, 1 indicating experimental conditions I and 2), KCCA replaces these simple labels with a label vector for each stimulus containing details of the features of that stimulus. We have compared KCCA and SVM analyses of an fMRI data set involving responses to emotionally salient stimuli. This involved first training the algorithm (SVM, KCCA) on a subset of fMRI data and the corresponding labels/label vectors (of pleasant and unpleasant), then testing the algorithms on data withheld from the original training phase. The classification accuracies of SVM and KCCA proved to be very similar. However, the most important result arising form this study is the KCCA is able to extract some regions that SVM also identifies as the most important in task discrimination and these are located manly in the visual cortex. The results of the KCCA were achieved blind to the categorical task labels. Instead, the stimulus category is effectively derived from the vector of image features. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1259
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2002, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision
[2]
[Anonymous], INT J NEURAL SYST
[3]
Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Beckmann, CF ;
Smith, SA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2004, 23 (02) :137-152
[4]
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[5]
Carlson TA, 2003, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V15, P704, DOI 10.1162/089892903322307429
[6]
Unsupervised robust nonparametric estimation of the hemodynamic response function for any fMRI experiment [J].
Ciuciu, P ;
Poline, JB ;
Marrelec, G ;
Idier, J ;
Pallier, C ;
Benali, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (10) :1235-1251
[7]
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) "brain reading": detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex [J].
Cox, DD ;
Savoy, RL .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (02) :261-270
[8]
Cristianini N., 2000, Intelligent Data Analysis: An Introduction
[9]
Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection [J].
Davatzikos, C ;
Ruparel, K ;
Fan, Y ;
Shen, DG ;
Acharyya, M ;
Loughead, JW ;
Gur, RC ;
Langleben, DD .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 28 (03) :663-668
[10]
Hidden Markov event sequence models: Toward unsupervised functional MRI brain mapping [J].
Faisan, S ;
Thoraval, L ;
Armspach, JP ;
Foucher, JR ;
Metz-Lutz, MN ;
Heitz, F .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (01) :25-36