Response to intravenous lidocaine infusion predicts subsequent response to oral mexiletine: A prospective study

被引:96
作者
Galer, BS
Harle, J
Rowbotham, MC
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL,MED CTR ROOSEVELT 354750,SEATTLE,WA 98105
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT NEUROL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[3] UNIV WASHINGTON,SCH MED,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
pain; neuropathy; lidocaine; mexiletine;
D O I
10.1016/0885-3924(96)00126-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The local anesthetic sodium-channel blockers lidocaine and mexiletine reduce spontaneous and evoked activity in experimental neuroma models and have been reported to relieve a variety of clinical neuropathic pain conditions. The predictive value of relief from an intravenous lidocaine infusion (IVL) for subsequent relief from a 4-week trial of oral mexiletine was assessed in a prospective study of nine subjects with chronic neuropathic pain of peripheral origin. Subjects received IVL, 2 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg, over 45 min during separate sessions in random order under double-blind conditions. One week later a 4-week titrating trial of oral mexiletine was initiated. Both doses of NL significantly reduced pain visual analogue scores (VAS) scores. Although IVL 5 mg/kg produced significantly higher pain relief scores than IVL 2 mg/kg, subjects responded in a highly consistent manner to the two NL. Subsequent response to oral mexiletine was significantly correlated with the average response to the two IVL. Mexiletine dose and blood levels were not correlated with pain relief The results suggest that IVL may be a valuable tool in selecting patients for oral therapy with analogous drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BARANOWSKI AP, 1993, P 7 WORLD C PAIN, P188
[2]   THE USE OF ORAL MEXILETINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN AFTER PERIPHERAL-NERVE INJURY [J].
CHABAL, C ;
JACOBSON, L ;
MARIANO, A ;
CHANEY, E ;
BRITELL, CW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) :513-517
[3]   THE EFFECT OF INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE, TOCAINIDE, AND MEXILETINE ON SPONTANEOUSLY ACTIVE FIBERS ORIGINATING IN RAT SCIATIC NEUROMAS [J].
CHABAL, C ;
RUSSELL, LC ;
BURCHIEL, KJ .
PAIN, 1989, 38 (03) :333-338
[4]  
DEJGARD A, 1988, LANCET, V2, P9
[5]   SYSTEMIC LIDOCAINE SILENCES ECTOPIC NEUROMA AND DRG DISCHARGE WITHOUT BLOCKING NERVE-CONDUCTION [J].
DEVOR, M ;
WALL, PD ;
CATALAN, N .
PAIN, 1992, 48 (02) :261-268
[6]  
EDWARDS WT, 1985, REGION ANESTH PAIN M, V10, P1
[7]   RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE INFUSION DIFFERS BASED ON CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS AND SITE OF NERVOUS-SYSTEM INJURY [J].
GALER, BS ;
MILLER, KV ;
ROWBOTHAM, MC .
NEUROLOGY, 1993, 43 (06) :1233-1235
[8]   INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE INFUSION A NEW TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PAINFUL DIABETIC NEUROPATHY [J].
KASTRUP, J ;
PETERSEN, P ;
DEJGARD, A ;
ANGELO, HR ;
HILSTED, J .
PAIN, 1987, 28 (01) :69-75
[9]   TREATMENT OF POSTHERPETIC NEURALGIA - ANTIDEPRESSANTS [J].
MAX, MB .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1994, 35 :S50-S53
[10]   MEXILETINE AND TOCAINIDE - A COMPARISON OF ANTIARRHYTHMIC EFFICACY, ADVERSE-EFFECTS, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE OF LIDOCAINE TESTING [J].
MURRAY, KT ;
BARBEY, JT ;
KOPELMAN, HA ;
SIDDOWAY, LA ;
ECHT, DS ;
WOOSLEY, RL ;
RODEN, DM .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1989, 45 (05) :553-561