Efficient HMAC-based secure communication for VANETs

被引:18
作者
Hu, Changhui [1 ,2 ]
Chim, Tat Wing [1 ]
Yiu, S. M. [1 ]
Hui, Lucas C. K. [1 ]
Li, Victor O. K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Comp Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Cryptol Technol & Informat Secur, Sch Math, Jinan 250100, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Secure vehicular sensor network; Authentication; Group communication; HMAC; Symmetric cryptography; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.comnet.2012.04.002
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) is an emerging type of network which facilitates vehicles on roads to communicate for driving safety. It requires a mechanism to help authenticate messages, identify valid vehicles, and remove malevolent vehicles which do not obey the rules. Most existing solutions either do not have an effective message verification scheme, or use the public key infrastructure (PKI). In this network, vehicles are able to broadcast messages to other vehicles and a group of known vehicles can also communicate securely among themselves. So group communication is necessary for the network. However, most existing solutions either do not consider this or use pairing operation to realize this. They are either not secure or not effective. In this paper, we provide a more comprehensive set of secure schemes with Hash-based Message Authentication Code (HMAC) in VANETs to overcome their shortcomings. Of course, we still need to use Pairing operation in some place. Our scheme is composed of three schemes: (1) Communications between Vehicles and Road-Side Units (RSUs), (2) One to One Communications within a Group, (3) One to One Communications without a Group. Based on our simulation study, we show that our schemes are effective and the delay caused is much lower. The average delay caused by our first scheme is nearly thousands of times lower than prior schemes. The average delay caused by our second scheme is 0.312 ms, while the delay caused by prior scheme is 12.3 ms. Meanwhile the average delay caused by our third scheme is 0.312 ms, and the delay caused by prior scheme is about 9 s. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2292 / 2303
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PROC IEEE GLOBAL TEL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 5280 RFC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, P USENIX SEC S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PROC 6 ANN IEEE COMM
[5]  
[Anonymous], P IEEE GLOBECOM 09 D
[6]  
[Anonymous], GLOB TEL C 2008 IEEE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, PROC 1 INT WORKSHOP
[8]  
Chaurasia Brijesh Kumar, 2008, 2008 Fourth International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks (WCSN-2008), P131, DOI 10.1109/WCSN.2008.4772697
[9]  
Chim T.W., VSPN VANET BAS UNPUB
[10]  
Chim T.W., 2009, TR200906 HKU