Small-bowel obstruction: Coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section multi-detector row CT

被引:46
作者
Jaffe, TA [1 ]
Martin, LC [1 ]
Thomas, J [1 ]
Adamson, AR [1 ]
DeLong, DM [1 ]
Paulson, EK [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2381050489
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively assess the added value of coronal reformations of the abdomen and pelvis from isotropic voxels by using 16-section multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction (SBO). Materials and Methods: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board of this medical center with a waiver of informed consent. One hundred consecutive patients ( 40 men and 60 women; mean age, 55 years) suspected of having SBO and abdominal pain underwent 16-section multi-detector row CT with coronal reformations. Twentynine patients had a final diagnosis of SBO, and 71 patients did not. Three independent readers blinded to the diagnosis interpreted the CT scout scan, then transverse scans alone, and then transverse plus coronal scans for the presence of SBO and abnormal wall enhancement. Confidence was scored with a 1-5 scale (1=absent, 5=present). Results: Mean sensitivity and specificity of CT scout alone, transverse CT alone, and transverse plus coronal CT for the diagnosis of SBO were 88% and 86%, 87% and 87%, and 87% and 90%, respectively ( not significant). In patients without SBO, transverse plus coronal CT enhanced confidence in the exclusion of SBO (P=.01). In patients with SBO, transverse plus coronal CT enhanced confidence in the diagnosis of SBO and identification of abnormal wall enhancement (P=.01). Conclusion: Transverse 16-section multi-detector row CT data sets are an excellent test for the diagnosis of SBO, while the addition of coronal reformations obtained from these isotropic data sets adds confidence to the diagnosis and exclusion of SBO. (c) RSNA, 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   CT OF SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (02) :255-261
[2]   CT evaluation of small bowel obstruction [J].
Boudiaf, M ;
Soyer, P ;
Terem, C ;
Pelage, JP ;
Maissiat, E ;
Rymer, R .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2001, 21 (03) :613-624
[3]   Pictorial essay - CT of small-bowel obstruction: Another perspective using multiplanar reformations [J].
Caoili, EM ;
Paulson, EK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (04) :993-998
[4]   Urinary tract abnormalities: Initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography [J].
Caoili, EM ;
Cohan, RH ;
Korobkin, M ;
Platt, JF ;
Francis, IR ;
Faerber, GJ ;
Montie, JE ;
Ellis, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 222 (02) :353-360
[5]   Isotropic half-millimeter angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts with 16-slice computed tomography [J].
Dewey, M ;
Lembcke, A ;
Enzweiler, C ;
Hamm, B ;
Rogalla, P .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (03) :800-804
[6]   Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT [J].
Fleischmann, D ;
Rubin, GD ;
Paik, DS ;
Yen, SY ;
Hilfiker, PR ;
Beaulieu, CF ;
Napel, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) :185-196
[7]   CT OF SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - VALUE IN ESTABLISHING THE DIAGNOSIS AND DETERMINING THE DEGREE AND CAUSE [J].
FRAGER, D ;
MEDWID, SW ;
BAER, JW ;
MOLLINELLI, B ;
FRIEDMAN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) :37-41
[8]   Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction [J].
Furukawa, A ;
Yamasaki, M ;
Furuichi, K ;
Yokoyama, K ;
Nagata, T ;
Takahashi, M ;
Murata, K ;
Sakamoto, T .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2001, 21 (02) :341-355
[9]   EFFICACY OF CT IN DISTINGUISHING SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION FROM OTHER CAUSES OF SMALL-BOWEL DILATATION [J].
GAZELLE, GS ;
GOLDBERG, MA ;
WITTENBERG, J ;
HALPERN, EF ;
PINKNEY, L ;
MUELLER, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) :43-47
[10]   Centennial Dissertation - Helical CT in the evaluation of the acute abdomen [J].
Gore, RM ;
Miller, FH ;
Pereles, FS ;
Yaghmai, V ;
Berlin, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (04) :901-913