Functional impairment as a predictor of spine loading

被引:32
作者
Marras, WS [1 ]
Ferguson, SA [1 ]
Burr, D [1 ]
Davis, KG [1 ]
Gupta, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Biodynam Lab, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
spinal loads; low back pain; low back disorder; electromyography; lifting biomechanics; musculoskeletal; rehabilitation; recurrent low back pain; secondary low back pain;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000157459.36970.62
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Spine loadings during a variety of lifting exertions were compared with individual torso kinematic abilities. Relationships were evaluated between these measures. Objective. To determine if trunk kinematic status ( functional impairment) is indicative of spine loading increases in patients with low back pain (LBP) compared to asymptomatic individuals. Summary of Background Data. Recurrent LBP is a common and costly problem that may be related to increased spine loads in those individuals with LBP. Previous studies suggest that patients with LBP had greater loading than their asymptomatic counterparts when performing work. However, we know little about how to identify when a patient with LBP can resume lifting tasks without having exaggerated spine loading. Methods. Sixty-two patients with LBP and 61 who were asymptomatic were evaluated for signs of kinematic compromise (i.e., inability to generate normal trunk kinematic patterns) during a prelift test. All subjects were then asked to perform a variety of lifting exertions that varied in lift origin ( region), lift asymmetry position, and weight lifted. An electromyography-assisted model was used to evaluate spine loading in each subject during the lifting exertions. Statistical models were used to assess the relationship between kinematic compromise and spine loading. Results. Patients with LBP had greater spine loading as well as greater kinematic compromise. The degree of kinematic compromise was related to the degree of spine loading increases in those individuals with LBP. A statistical model was developed that was able to describe 87% of the variability in compression, 61% in anteroposterior shear, and 65% in lateral shear. Conclusions. Those patients with greater kinematic compromise used higher levels of antagonistic muscle coactivation that not only reduced trunk motion but also resulted in increases in spine loading. Given the degree of kinematic compromise and the lifting task conditions, a method has been devised to predict the increase in spine loading above and beyond that of an asymptomatic individual when performing typical materials handling tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 737
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, LOW BACK DISORDERS E
[2]   The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics [J].
Davis, KG ;
Marras, WS .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (10) :703-717
[3]   Method for measuring external spinal loads during unconstrained free-dynamic lifting [J].
Fathallah, FA ;
Marras, WS ;
Parnianpour, M ;
Granata, KP .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 30 (09) :975-978
[4]   An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks [J].
Fathallah, FA ;
Marras, WS ;
Parnianpour, M .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (06) :706-716
[5]   AN EMG-ASSISTED MODEL OF TRUNK LOADING DURING FREE-DYNAMIC LIFTING [J].
GRANATA, KP ;
MARRAS, WS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (11) :1309-1317
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF TRUNK MUSCLE COACTIVITY ON DYNAMIC SPINAL LOADS [J].
GRANATA, KP ;
MARRAS, WS .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (08) :913-919
[7]   A method for measuring external loads during dynamic lifting exertions [J].
Granata, KP ;
Marras, WS ;
Fathallah, FA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (09) :1219-1222
[8]   Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder [J].
Granata, KP ;
Marras, WS .
ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (09) :1187-1199
[9]  
HAMRICK C, 2000, INT ERG ASS IEA 2000
[10]   FUNCTIONAL RESTORATION WITH BEHAVIORAL SUPPORT - A ONE-YEAR PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
HAZARD, RG ;
FENWICK, JW ;
KALISCH, SM ;
REDMOND, J ;
REEVES, V ;
REID, S ;
FRYMOYER, JW .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (02) :157-161