Tailored interventions to communicate stage-matched information to smokers in different motivational stages

被引:112
作者
Dijkstra, A
De Vries, H
Roijackers, J
van Breukelen, G
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Educ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-006X.66.3.549
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Smokers in stages of low readiness to quit (immotives and precontemplators) and smokers in stages of high readiness to quit (contemplators and preparers) were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 tailored intervention conditions offering outcome information, self-efficacy-enhancing information, both sorts of information, or no information. Data on 1,540 smokers, stratified by stage, were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was stage transition. The hypotheses with regard to stage-matched information for immotives and precontemplators were not verified. With regard to contemplators and preparers, the following was found: Compared with the control group, contemplators benefited the most from both sorts of information, whereas preparers benefited the most from self-efficacy-enhancing information only. Comparisons between contemplators and preparers who were assigned to the matched treatment and contemplators and preparers who were assigned to the mismatched treatment supported these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 557
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, 3rd Edn
[2]   SELF-EFFICACY AS AN IMPORTANT DETERMINANT OF QUITTING AMONG PREGNANT-WOMEN WHO SMOKE - THE PHI-PATTERN [J].
DEVRIES, H ;
BACKBIER, E .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (02) :167-174
[3]   THE PROCESS OF SMOKING CESSATION - AN ANALYSIS OF PRECONTEMPLATION, CONTEMPLATION, AND PREPARATION STAGES OF CHANGE [J].
DICLEMENTE, CC ;
FAIRHURST, SK ;
VELASQUEZ, MM ;
PROCHASKA, JO ;
VELICER, WF ;
ROSSI, JS .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 59 (02) :295-304
[4]   Subtypes within a sample of precontemplating smokers: A preliminary extension of the stages of change [J].
Dijkstra, A ;
Bakker, M ;
DeVries, H .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1997, 22 (03) :327-337
[5]   Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation [J].
Dijkstra, A ;
DeVries, H ;
Bakker, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 64 (04) :758-763
[6]  
DIJKSTRA A, IN PRESS HLTH ED RES
[7]  
HEATHERTON TF, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P1119
[8]   STATISTICAL HANDLING OF DROP-OUTS IN LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
HEYTING, A ;
TOLBOOM, JTBM ;
ESSERS, JGA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (16) :2043-2061
[9]  
Janis I., 1977, Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
[10]   SMOKING CESSATION - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED OVER THE PAST DECADE [J].
LICHTENSTEIN, E ;
GLASGOW, RE .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 60 (04) :518-527