Assessing the impact of the requirement for explicit consent in a hospital-based stroke study

被引:19
作者
Jackson, C. [1 ]
Crossland, L. [1 ]
Dennis, M. [1 ]
Wardlaw, J. [1 ]
Sudlow, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Western Gen Hosp, Div Clin Neurosci, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/qjmed/hcm152
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Increasing regulation of medical research, in particular the requirement for explicit consent, may reduce the quantity and quality of clinical epidemiological research. Aim: To assess the potential biases arising from the need for explicit consent in our hospital-based stroke research register. Design: Comparison of patients enrolled into our stroke research register with those included in a concurrent clinical stroke audit that targeted the same population but did not require explicit consent. Methods: We obtained the numbers of consenters, refusers and those from whom consent was not sought for various logistical reasons. We compared characteristics of participants (those eventually included in the research register) vs. non-participants. Results: Of 1228 patients included in the stroke audit during an 18-month period, 1075 (88) were also included in the research register, with higher participation among outpatients than inpatients. Only 1 of eligible patients refused involvement in any aspect of the research register. By far the largest number of non-participants was those from whom we could not seek consent for practical reasons. Comparison of baseline characteristics showed important differences between participants and non-participants that could affect outcome. Conclusions: Very few patients refused inclusion in our research register, but the need for explicit consent reduced participation and introduced bias. An opt-out system avoiding the need for explicit patient consent for minimally intrusive clinical epidemiological studies would minimize bias and reduce the considerable time and costs associated with the consent process.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit - Overprotection could damage the public interest
    Al-Shahi, R
    Warlow, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7268): : 1031 - 1032
  • [2] Bias from. requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: Prospective, population based study
    Al-Shahi, R
    Vousden, C
    Warlow, C
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7522): : 942 - 945
  • [3] CLASSIFICATION AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF CLINICALLY IDENTIFIABLE SUBTYPES OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION
    BAMFORD, J
    SANDERCOCK, P
    DENNIS, M
    BURN, J
    WARLOW, C
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8756) : 1521 - 1526
  • [4] National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry
    Barrett, G
    Cassell, JA
    Peacock, JL
    Coleman, MP
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7549): : 1068 - 1070A
  • [5] GLODBLATT P, 2006, BRIT MED J, V332, P169
  • [6] Epidemiology - Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act
    Iversen, A
    Liddell, K
    Fear, N
    Hotopf, M
    Wessely, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7534): : 165 - 169
  • [7] A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit database
    McKinney, PA
    Jones, S
    Parslow, R
    Davey, N
    Darowski, M
    Chaudhry, B
    Stack, C
    Parry, G
    Draper, ES
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7496): : 877 - 879
  • [8] McLoone P., 2004, CARSTAIRS SCORES SCO
  • [9] Funding for practice-oriented clinical research
    Rothwell, Peter M.
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 368 (9532) : 262 - 266
  • [10] *STOKE UN TRIAL CO, 2001, COCHRANE DATABASE SY