Comparison of present pain intensity assessments on horizontally and vertically oriented visual analogue scales

被引:20
作者
Breivik, EK
Skoglund, LA
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Oral Surg & Oral Med, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Sect Dent Pharmacol & Pharmacotherapy, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
来源
METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY | 1998年 / 20卷 / 08期
关键词
pain; rating scales; acute postoperative pain; oral surgery; visual analogue scale;
D O I
10.1358/mf.1998.20.8.487509
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Contrary results have been reported from studies comparing horizontal and vertical orientations of the visual analogue scale (VAS) in non-dental pain states. The vertical orientation of the VAS has been used in our department for several years while the horizontal orientation is the most commonly used in other acute pain models. The present study investigated whether a horizontally oriented VAS is as sensitive as a vertically oriented VAS in the assessment of present pain after oral surgery Seventy-four patients recorded their. pain intensity hourly and half-hourly 15 times during II hours after surgery on a horizontal and on a vertical 100 mm VAS. Slightly lower mean and median values were observed at 2/3 of the observation time points for the vertical VAS compared to the horizontal VAS. The results from the two scales were compared with analysis of variance for repealed measures. No significant differences between the horizontal and the vertical VAS-values were found (p = 0.099). Distributions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and dispersions of data were also similar with the two orientations of the VAS. This study shows that a vertically oriented VAS is equally sensitive as a horizontally oriented VAS in assessing present pain intensity after oral surgery. (C) 1998 Prous Science. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 724
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AITKEN RCB, 1970, BRIT J HOSP MED, V4, P215
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ADV PAIN RES THER
[3]   EVALUATION OF THE USE OF VISUAL ANALOG SCALE IN CHINESE PATIENTS [J].
AUN, C ;
LAM, YM ;
COLLETT, B .
PAIN, 1986, 25 (02) :215-221
[4]  
BANOS JE, 1989, METHOD FIND EXP CLIN, V11, P123
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN .1. ASPECTS OF THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
CARLSSON, AM .
PAIN, 1983, 16 (01) :87-101
[7]  
CHAPMAN CR, 1990, MANAGEMENT PAIN, P580
[8]   REPRODUCIBILITY ALONG A 10-CM VERTICAL VISUAL ANALOG SCALE [J].
DIXON, JS ;
BIRD, HA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1981, 40 (01) :87-89
[9]   STUDIES WITH PAIN RATING-SCALES [J].
DOWNIE, WW ;
LEATHAM, PA ;
RHIND, VM ;
WRIGHT, V ;
BRANCO, JA ;
ANDERSON, JA .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (04) :378-381
[10]   The graphic rating scale [J].
Freyd, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1923, 14 :83-102