Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study

被引:276
作者
van Veen, V
Carter, CS
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Imaging Res Ctr, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Ctr Neural Basis Cognit, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychiat, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Stroop; interference; executive control; attention; prefrontal cortex; anterior cingulate cortex;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.042
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Attentive behavior requires the ability to perform in the face of distraction. Distracting information can cause conflict at any level along the information processing stream. However, it is not yet known whether the brain has distinct subsystems dedicated to detecting and resolving these different forms of distraction. Although previous studies have localized brain activity during semantic and response conflict, no prior study has specifically determined whether these activations occur in distinct or overlapping regions. We used a modified version of the Stroop color-word task, by which we were able to separate semantic from response conflict. Behavioral data indicate that these two kinds of conflict both contribute to the overall Stroop interference effect, while fMRI data indicate that they elicit non-overlapping activation in anterior cingulate, prefrontal, and parietal brain regions. These results suggest that the brain has distinct but parallel attentional mechanisms for resolving these different forms of cognitive interference. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms [J].
Badre, D ;
Wagner, AD .
NEURON, 2004, 41 (03) :473-487
[2]  
Badre David, 2002, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V1, P206, DOI 10.1177/1534582302001003002
[3]   Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMIRI [J].
Banich, MT ;
Milham, MP ;
Atchley, RA ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Webb, A ;
Wszalek, T ;
Kramer, AF ;
Liang, ZP ;
Barad, V ;
Gullett, D ;
Shah, C ;
Brown, C .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (1-2) :1-9
[4]   fMRI studies of stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection [J].
Banich, MT ;
Milham, MP ;
Atchley, R ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Webb, A ;
Wszalek, T ;
Kramer, AF ;
Liang, ZP ;
Wright, A ;
Shenker, J ;
Magin, R .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (06) :988-1000
[5]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of response modality and processing domain [J].
Barch, DM ;
Braver, TS ;
Akbudak, E ;
Conturo, T ;
Ollinger, J ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :837-848
[6]   INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF ATTENTION USING THE STROOP TEST [J].
BENCH, CJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
GRASBY, PM ;
FRISTON, KJ ;
PAULESU, E ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
DOLAN, RJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (09) :907-922
[7]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[8]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[9]   On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons? [J].
Brown, M ;
Besner, D .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (06) :903-904
[10]   Dissociable contributions of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection [J].
Bunge, SA ;
Hazeltine, E ;
Scanlon, MD ;
Rosen, AC ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (03) :1562-1571