Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumblebees

被引:191
作者
Rundloef, Maj [1 ]
Nilsson, Helena [1 ]
Smith, Henrik G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Ecol Anim Ecol, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden
关键词
agri-environment schemes; bombus; conservation; landscape heterogeneity; organic farming; spatial scale;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.011
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Organic farming has been suggested to counteract declines in farmland biodiversity, but comparisons to conventional farming have produced variable outcomes. To examine whether this is due to the landscape context farms are situated in and traits of the studied organisms, we surveyed bumble bees in cereal field borders and margins at 12 pairs of matched organic and conventional farms, with half the pairs located in heterogeneous farmland and the remaining in homogeneous plains. Species richness and abundance of bumble bees were significantly positively related to both organic farming and landscape heterogeneity. However, there was an interaction effect between farming practice and landscape context so that species richness and abundance were only significantly higher on organic farms in homogeneous landscapes. The higher abundance of bumble bees on organic farms was partly related to higher flower abundance on these sites. The effect of landscape context on bumble bee abundance was stronger for species with medium sized colonies than for those with smaller and larger colony sizes. These patterns may reflect that species with medium sized foraging ranges are most affected by fragmentation of foraging habitat, because colony size reflects the spatial scale at which bumble bees utilize resources. We conclude that both organic farming and landscape heterogeneity can be used to increase bumblebee species richness and abundance, but that organic farming has a larger effect in homogeneous landscapes and landscape heterogeneity a larger effect on conventional farms. The effects differed between species, suggesting that a single prescription to increase pollinator abundance may not be valid. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RED LIST POLLINATOR
[2]   Conservation value of the herbaceous vegetation in hedgerows -: does organic farming make a difference? [J].
Aude, E ;
Tybirk, K ;
Michelsen, A ;
Ejrnæs, R ;
Hald, AB ;
Mark, S .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 118 (04) :467-478
[3]   Habitat quality of field margins in a Finnish farmland area for bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus and Psithyrus) [J].
Bäckman, JPC ;
Tiainen, J .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 89 (1-2) :53-68
[4]   The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance:: a meta-analysis [J].
Bengtsson, J ;
Ahnström, J ;
Weibull, AC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2005, 42 (02) :261-269
[5]  
Benton T., 2006, BUMBLE BEES NATURAL
[6]   Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? [J].
Benton, TG ;
Vickery, JA ;
Wilson, JD .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (04) :182-188
[7]   Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands [J].
Biesmeijer, J. C. ;
Roberts, S. P. M. ;
Reemer, M. ;
Ohlemueller, R. ;
Edwards, M. ;
Peeters, T. ;
Schaffers, A. P. ;
Potts, S. G. ;
Kleukers, R. ;
Thomas, C. D. ;
Settele, J. ;
Kunin, W. E. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5785) :351-354
[8]   Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services:: an example from Sweden [J].
Björklund, J ;
Limburg, KE ;
Rydberg, T .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (02) :269-291
[9]   Habitat use and conservation of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) under different grassland management regimes [J].
Carvell, C .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 103 (01) :33-49
[10]   Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale [J].
Carvell, Claire ;
Roy, David B. ;
Smart, Simon M. ;
Pywell, Richard F. ;
Preston, Chris D. ;
Goulson, Dave .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 132 (04) :481-489